Anonymous ID: 85bd64 June 22, 2020, 10:31 a.m. No.9707787   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7832 >>8063

>>9707629

according to the CDC, not wearing a mask can pose a health threat to others which negates the "reasonable accommodation" provided by ADA. and provides businesses the ability to deny service to a customer.

not saying that mandatory masks are a good thing but we need a stronger argument than the ADA imo. especially since anyone can just lie since they dont have to disclose. its kind of a dishonest approach to avoiding mandatory mask laws. there was also an earlier version of this that included HIPA, which wasnt even applicable and was misspelled as HIPPA, which didnt help

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/voices/stop-using-the-ada-and-hipaa-to-get-out-of-wearing-masks/ar-BB14tIy0

Anonymous ID: 85bd64 June 22, 2020, 10:41 a.m. No.9707918   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7970

>>9707832

im not sure you understood my post anon. HIPA is irrelevant. it doesnt apply at all. it concerns doctors releasing medical info without consent.

the American Disabilities Act is LAW. it includes a reporting mechanism for infractions of those laws and provides protections for people with disabilities. but thanks to the cocksuckers at CDC, businesses can claim no maks is a danger to other people, which negates any obligation to make "reasonable accommodations" for a person with a disability.

this is the argument from the left, you dont have to agree with it but its a solid defense unfortunately. which is why i figured there must be something in the constitution that would be a better defense. can a governor pass a law mandating that you wear safety glasses, a burka, red clothes, assless chaps? and still be compliant with the constitution? no.

Anonymous ID: 85bd64 June 22, 2020, 10:53 a.m. No.9708051   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9708006

oh, you're conveniently employed in a position that gives you all the info you need to refute my points but dont have to reveal that info to prove your own points because you believe i cant have an understanding of the law because im not conveniently employed in a position that gives me the same info you do? some logic you got there. your starting to sound pretty shilly faggot.

go on and continue to say your right, im wrong while providing nothing to support your shit.