Anonymous ID: 2cfcdf June 22, 2020, 7:08 p.m. No.9713016   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3251 >>3440 >>3530

Last Bread:

>>9712256, >>9712274 Is vandalism of a national monument a misdemeanor or felony?

Not clear to me what the answer is on this question from these regs. Below is a law review article exploring the broader question of whether it's culturally acceptable to destroy statutes. Author say yes, under some circumstances, so he's probably not conservative. But could provide more insight into the legal side of the question. Here's an excerpt (long article):

 

==Monuments to the Confederacy and the Right to

Destroy in Cultural-Property Law==

E . PEROT BISSELL V (2019)

 

In this Note, I argue that cultural-heritage law should recognize a limited

right to destroy cultural property. A government should be permitted to destroy

its cultural property, but only when that property was established in celebration

of a violation of the customary international law of human rights. This approach

recognizes the values served by destruction without casting aside the valuable

protection that cultural-heritage law has afforded historically and aesthetically

important art and architecture.

Part I sets out the background for this theory: historically, cultural-property

law developed in response to widely deplored acts of destruction. As a result, the

law orients itself around the value of preservation. However, cultural-property

law has not meaningfully considered either why preservation is valuable or what

deserves legal protection. It has also not considered when the destruction of cultural property might be warranted or desirable.

Part II points out the flaws of such a regime. I argue that important expressive and cathartic values can be served through the converse of cultural-property

law’s core value: destruction. I then examine some of the most commonly offered

alternatives to destruction and conclude that a community could reasonably prefer destruction over these alternatives in some cases….

https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9326&context=ylj

https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol128/iss4/5/

 

= = = = =

 

This author is probably not interested in the current penalties for defacing or destroying statutes, only in whether it's acceptable by cultural standards.

Anonymous ID: 2cfcdf June 22, 2020, 7:10 p.m. No.9713043   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3084 >>3107 >>3235 >>3251 >>3440 >>3530

>>9712878

TYB

 

RE new Q on prepping

How can bakers prep?

  1. good comms w/ bakers & anons

  2. baker on duty 24/7 if possible

  3. support new bakers & note collectors

  4. protect the dough / the breads

  5. ensure Q has a place to post at all times

  6. make sure notes are accurate/newsworthy

  7. keep shills in check re false claims about kitch

 

Good time to have fast, reliable pastebin alt, kek. Thx developer anon!

Anonymous ID: 2cfcdf June 22, 2020, 7:15 p.m. No.9713129   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3252

>>9713010

>>9713030

>premeditated

Hard to prove premeditation for many reasons but one is the tendency of people to act in a way that is deliberate wo being fully conscious. Think of passive-aggressive behavior for example. Due to cognitive dissonance, most people - even pretty blackhearted people - don't actually like to think of themselves as having bad motives. So they act in ways that are destructive but when confronted claim "i didn't realize."

 

We've all seen this in people we know (and maybe in ourselves at times). In a sense, it's true. But in another, it's a lie - a semi-conscious lie. Slippery and hard to pin down.

Anonymous ID: 2cfcdf June 22, 2020, 7:17 p.m. No.9713164   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3308

>>9713104

Yes obviously at war.

But legal specifics will become important in turning them back.

Not a lawfag so i have limits in how far i can pursue a digg like this. Pretty arcane branch of property law, imo.

Anonymous ID: 2cfcdf June 22, 2020, 7:27 p.m. No.9713340   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Rudy talking about BLM on Ingraham right now.

Brings to mind this:

BLM has a booth with giant letters on the front in NE Seattle on Sandpoint Way NE (just east of U Village). Saw at least half a dozen people waiting.

Volunteering? Making donations? What?

 

Any other anons seeing booths like this is their city?

Anonymous ID: 2cfcdf June 22, 2020, 7:30 p.m. No.9713379   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9713353 CCP Virus Is Losing Virulence, May Vanish Without Need for Vaccine: Italian Doctor

nom

not in qresear.ch

 

>https://www.theepochtimes.com/ccp-virus-is-losing-virulence-may-vanish-without-need-for-vaccine-italian-doctor_3397962.html

Anonymous ID: 2cfcdf June 22, 2020, 7:32 p.m. No.9713414   🗄️.is 🔗kun

On Ingraham:

Destroying statues (with stained glass to come next acc to Laura)

the $64,000 q:

Where are they getting the funding to do it?

Anonymous ID: 2cfcdf June 22, 2020, 7:35 p.m. No.9713457   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3493

>>9713408

>dumb niggers

never underestimate the enemy

they may be crazy but they're not dumb

know exactly what they are doing and why

Laura I is articulating it perfectly right this moment on TV

serious enemy