>>9717374 PB
The Governors, Negligent Death Law and "Q said Target Practice". The payoff might be in the evidence gathered… while relatives harmed recover under a lesser legal standard.
Looked at these laws.
>Q asked questions (Q4477)
>https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1272661471382700032📁
>It's not what you know but what you can prove.
>Q: can we prove it?
>Q: can we prove coordination?
>Q: can we prove deliberate action to inc death count to justify vote-by-mail, stay-at-home, bail-out-state, kill-economy, kill-P-rallies, inc unemployment, etc?
>Q
Then he gave us this target practice. OP listed the wrongful death laws of the states. Got me thinking…..
The laws here are civil wrongful death, which is brought by the families, and not criminally by the state. There is no chance of going to jail, but there is compensation.
Criminal prosecution requires the standard "beyond a reasonable doubt". This pretty much means there can be no other explanation, to find the defendant guilty of murder, in many instances. Tough without evidence, that they are no doubt hiding.
BUT…..
If people (injured relatives) bring CIVIL suit of wrongful death, the standard is a "preponderance of the evidence" not "beyond a reasonable doubt".
A much lower standard, where no jail time involved, however, the plaintiff receives compensation for the wrong if the defendant is found guilty by this lower standard.
If I recall, OJ Simpson was not found guilty under "beyond a reasonable doubt" however the civil trials found him guilty based on a preponderance of the evidence, due to the lower standard of proof to win the case.
>It's not what you know but what you can prove.
>Q: can we prove it?
If these cases are started by the living relatives of the nursing home patients, what it CAN do is start official discovery, for the proofs for the future criminal trial.
And what if we find that coordination we suspect in the form of evidence?
To me it is an open and shut case, in any instance where the governor either:
1) simultaneously decreed that the nursing homes would not be responsible for any deaths that happened because of the public Executive Order forcing them to take COVID patients. (proves they thought about the risks and decided to play Russian roulette with a bullet in the chamber.) [Knowingly]. This would raise things to Murder II at least.
OR….any governor who….
2) included in the EO, a paragraph stating the nursing homes were not allowed to test the patients as they came in for COVID. Since all other hospital facilities were testing, and the nation was screaming for tests, this shows the attempt to deny evidence necessary to show "foreknowledge" of the risks of their actions. Again, showing they knew there was a bullet in the chamber.
If I was related to someone who died as a result of the actions of these governors, I would absolutely talk to an attorney, and split the proceeds, just to see what there is in the way of discovery to prove the future criminal case that has no statute of limitations, because murder has none.
Remember that these civil suits have statutes of limitations. I saw 2 years on one of them. So if you want to see these governors prosecuted for what they did, mebbe it starts by encouraging relatives of the nursing home dead to sue those governors for wrongful death, start discovery, and find that proof needed for the murder charges (criminal)??? And mebbe these lawsuits have to start NOW due to the statute of limitations on civil wrongful death.
Just wondering.