Anonymous ID: 670047 June 23, 2020, 1:22 p.m. No.9721125   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1393

Mueller prosecutor: DOJ sentencing instructions for Roger Stone based on 'political considerations'

 

The Justice Department’s sentencing instructions for Roger Stone “were based on political considerations," according to a member of special counsel Robert Mueller's team who led the successful prosecution of the longtime Trump associate. Aaron Zelinsky, who was a special assistant U.S. attorney in Washington, withdrew from the case in February, along with three other prosecutors following the Justice Department’s decision to walk back its sentencing reco mmendation of seven to nine years in prison. Zelinsky, who now works for the U.S. attorney’s office in Maryland, will testify before the Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. “At the time of the events in question ⁠— February 2020, I was a career Assistant United States Attorney. I was not privy to discussions with political leadership at the Department of Justice. My understanding of what happened in United States v. Stone is based on two things,” Zelinsky’s prepared opening statement reads. “The first is what I saw with my own eyes: the unusual and unprecedented way that Roger Stone’s sentencing was handled by the Department of Justice. The second is what was told to me at the time by my supervisors in the U.S. Attorney’s Office: why the Department was treating Roger Stone differently from everyone else.”

 

Zelinsky will testify that he saw the Justice Department “exerting significant pressure on the line prosecutors in the case to obscure the correct Sentencing Guidelines calculation to which Roger Stone was subject ⁠— and to water down and in some cases outright distort the events that transpired in his trial and the criminal conduct that gave rise to his conviction.” The DOJ official will also state that what he “repeatedly” heard was that Stone “was being treated differently from any other defendant because of his relationship to the President.” Zelinsky will say that the now-former acting U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Timothy Shea, was “receiving heavy pressure from the highest levels of the Department of Justice to cut Stone a break, and that the U.S. Attorney’s sentencing instructions to us were based on political considerations.”

 

Zelinsky will say he was told Shea was giving Stone “such unprecedentedly favorable treatment” because the U.S. attorney was “afraid of the President.” Zelinsky will say he and his fellow line attorneys “immediately and repeatedly raised concerns, in writing and orally, that such political favoritism was wrong and contrary to legal ethics and Department policy.” The Justice Department has denied such politicization existed. Attorney General William Barr publicly griped about Trump's commentary on the case after the president congratulated his top law enforcement official for "taking charge" of a case the president described as being out of control. “I have a problem with some of the tweets,” the attorney general said, noting that Trump's posts about DOJ business made it "impossible" to do his job. “The Stone case was prosecuted while I was attorney general — and I supported it,” Barr said. “I thought that was a righteous prosecution. And I was happy that he was convicted.” “I think it’s time to stop the tweeting about Department of Justice criminal cases,” Barr said. “I’m not going to be bullied or influenced by anybody … whether it’s Congress, a newspaper editorial board, or the president.”

 

In February, after the Justice Department recommended a prison sentence of up to nine years for Stone, Trump tweeted that he “cannot allow this miscarriage of justice!” The Justice Department then reversed itself, and the four line prosecutors withdrew. The department said its decision to reverse course was made before Barr was aware of Trump’s position, and the president denied placing any pressure on the agency. The Justice Department walked back the “unduly high” sentence recommendation, suggesting three to four years instead but ultimately leaving it up to the judge.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mueller-prosecutor-doj-sentencing-instructions-for-roger-stone-based-on-political-considerations

https://judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/zelinsky_opening_statement_hjc.pdf

Anonymous ID: 670047 June 23, 2020, 1:43 p.m. No.9721409   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Twitter slaps 'abusive behavior' notice on Trump tweet about DC protests

 

Twitter has put a notice on a tweet from President Trump, calling it "abusive behavior." The platform noted that the tweet violated their terms of service. The tweet from the president read, "There will never be an 'Autonomous Zone' in Washington, D.C., as long as I’m your President. If they try they will be met with serious force!" "We’ve placed a public interest notice on this Tweet for violating our policy against abusive behavior, specifically, the presence of a threat of harm against an identifiable group," Twitter posted. They added, "Per our policies, this Tweet will remain on the service given its relevance to ongoing public conversation."

 

Users will not be able to like or comment on the tweet, neither will they be able to retweet the post without comment. Other tweets from the president have been labeled with notices to users in recent days. Late last month, after riots broke out in the wake of the death of George Floyd, a black man who died in police custody, Trump tweeted, "These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!" Twitter put a "public interest notice" on the tweet, writing, "This Tweet violates our policies regarding the glorification of violence based on the historical context of the last line, its connection to violence, and the risk it could inspire similar actions today."

 

The president responded, "It's very simple, nobody should have any problem with this other than the haters, and those looking to cause trouble on social media." The day before the incident, Trump signed an executive order that took aim at the Communications Decency Act, which allows websites broad authority to moderate their own content. The Trump administration argues that social media companies haven't been operating in "good faith."

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/twitter-slaps-abusive-behavior-notice-on-trump-tweet-about-dc-protests

 

Jack is so unhinged he doesn't know the difference between Autonomous Zone a Location and a Group, not mention of a Group in that tweet.