>>9723112 pb
Right, just because someone claims "there has been no arrests?" (Which itself is untrue because there has been....)
Doesn't mean that there won't any or that there have been more of which we are unaware;
Logic professor said
"Absence of Evidence
does not equal
Evidence of Absence"
Doesn't mean that there won't BE, NOR that there have been SOME of which we are unaware;
Still having trouble with that sentence:
Doesn't mean that there wont BE ARRESTS in the FUTURE
NOR DOES IT MEAN we are necessarily aware of all arrests that could've potentially (possibly) occurred.
Relates to the deal with AOC and the tweet about hoping the economy would continue to tank so POTUS would lose.
People say the tweet didn't happen
People have screen shots but others contend those were faked.
The tweet is unavailable;
therefor a lack of evidence for the tweet.
So the shills just claim it didn't happen
Though Levin says it did.
He also says it doesn't matter since it's something she would've said.
Thank you for your indulgence since I didn't type it out correctly, but you got the gist anyway.
o7
>>9723197 pb