Important to note here is that the notes conflict with the rice memo which states Comey said their was an “unusual” amount of communication between Flynn and Kislyak, which was concerning.
My point is the rice memo clearly implies something nefarious. These notes do not.
Yes, I’m aware.
This is my concern. Can he do this? Was he actually a party to the appeals court case?
Can the court decline to hear it?
Lawfags: can the appeals,court refuse an en banc review if asked?