Lawfag here. You think this is over? Kek.
Sullivan is going to demand an en banc review by the full DC Court of Appeals.
>Sullivan is going to demand an en banc review by the full DC Court of Appeals.
The purpose of all of this is to keep Flynn gagged until after Nov 3. It's stalling and delay. Period.
Uh. Yes.
>Question: Does it matter much where Flynn is concerned? It appears he is out of legal jeopardy at this point irrespective of when it's "formalized"?
He is still gagged. The delay will be to keep him quiet. He knows where the bodies are buried. He will sing like a bird. In public. Trumpslide follows. They know this.
>This is my concern. Can he do this? Was he actually a party to the appeals court case?
Yes, he can. Procedure.
>He HAS to comply and dismiss this case.
>He can order all the bullshit he wants….AFTER CASE IS DISMISSED
That's not how this works. Three judge panel orders can be appealed to en banc sitting (all judges, not just three)
>Not by Sullivan, he has no party affiliation to either the prosecutor or defense.
I didn't say "by Sullivan."
>Anyone can get on here and say what they want.
>You need to drop the sauce bitch or get the fuck out.
Read up and learn or STFU. I'm not your personal news source.
https://twitter.com/NormEisen/status/1275810890659618816
Seriously, anon? You think you know more about sleazy law shit than him?
Fmr. Impeachment Special Counsel, US Amb. & Obama WH Ethics Czar.
>before this En Banc concept takes hold I am gonna shoot it down.
Uh huh. You obviously don't know what kind of fucking legal shitweasels we are dealing with here.
Just wait.
I'll stop now so you can all bask in this "victory."