What Twitter is apparently trying to say here is that even the suggestion of enforcing the law in some theoretical situation that didn’t even happen is “abuse.” You can try to understand that if you want, but I’m not really sure that’s what you should do. It seems to me that their goal here is simply to dazzle. They are trying to confuse you, by trying to make you try to understand what the meaning of this is.
This is the goal with many things now.
Here are a few examples of things the government/media is saying right now that make no sense and are in direct conflict with reality:
Rayshard Brooks, the black who attacked the cops in Atlanta, stole their taser and tried to fire it at them was “jovial” and “cooperative.”
Rayshard Brooks was right to resist arrest, as he had reason to believe that after the handcuffs were put on him, the police would murder him because they hated the color of his skin.
Rayshard Brooks was shot in the back while sleeping in his car.
The blacks that were rioting and looting across the country after George Floyd’s death were actually white supremacists (vaguely, it was suggested they were wearing rubber masks, I think).
The blacks shooting each other in The Chop were actually white supremacists and it is the fault of Donald Trump.
The man in New Mexico who shot an Antifa after he was chased down and beaten while Antifa was screaming “we’ll fucking kill you” was a white supremacist terrorist who opened fire on peaceful protesters.
The police are committing a genocide against black people.
They are doing it constantly now. They are just saying completely insane things, openly telling you not to believe your own eyes. I think they are purposefully saying these things to confuse you.
They’re not simply attacking white people. They are attacking truth and reality itself. It is emotionally exhausting to be exposed to it. It is extremely violating. It is a kind of psychic rape, to say the things in that bulletpoint list and so many other things they’ve been saying lately. It is so dark.
This began years ago. It might have started with forcing people to accept trannies as normal. Really, the entire Russian election hacking thing was the big push. No element of that made any sense. They ultimately were saying that posting things on the internet is “election interference.” Now we have Twitter preventing the actual presidential candidate from freely communicating, and somehow that is “protecting the community.”
The fact in itself that Twitter is engaging in this censorship is intended to drive you insane, I believe. I mean aside from the weird messages about “abusive behavior,” the very fact that it is happening at all, this open election meddling by this company, is intended as a kind of shock and awe.