Q, how do we recognize the infiltrators in the movement?

Some are obvious, but others garner massive followings and lead anons astray with distraction and disinfo.

You’ve shared anons before - all are dug on, some are legit, but rarely is clown 100% confirmed. We would like to avoid a digital “Ft. Hood” infiltrator….where big accounts can potentially lead the flock to slaughter…

Should we/could we identify the LARPS, shills and clowns? Any tips?