Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 2:34 a.m. No.9740805   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0813

>>9740696

I challenge you to find out yourself.

Try it for one day. Don't check /qresearch/ or qmap. Don't go on the chans. Don't use social media because you're probably following redpilled accounts.

Instead, spend one day, just one, living like an average normie.

>wake up, turn on your local ABC station for the news and watch the morning news

>watch the ads, too

>go about your day and don't check redpilled sources; do your best to forget what's looming in the background

>sit down and watch CNN or MSNBC for your afternoon or evening news

>watch the ads, too

>watch Netflix or some kind of late night comedy garbage to fall asleep

>watch the ads, too

There. That's how.

Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 2:55 a.m. No.9740898   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0907 >>0917

>>9740842

>herd mentality (ex: laugh track)

>responsibility: rewiring and reshaping one another's brains actively through communication

>people passively accept info from people they trust; we have a responsibility to be aware of what we say to our friends and peers

>it's hip to be a cynical dickhead who thinks nothing matters; smugness ("I told you so" is a pyrrhic victory)

>hopeless/angry=manufactured worldview that contradicts history

>blackpill=contagious, self-fulfilling prophecy

>DEMORALIZATION TACTICS

>morale is everything

>there's a reason why demoralization is used by the enemy and inspiration is used by generals

>they want us marginalized and submissive and afraid

>we have a choice between siding with hope or hopelessness

>mutually helping or draining one another

>the power lies with us to choose

>choose victory

I took notes. Very interesting video and I have to agree with its central idea.

Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 3:03 a.m. No.9740924   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0946

>>9740907

No, thank you for sharing. I'll have to remember this the next time I want to get into a negativity spiral.

 

>>9740917

I'd like to know the antidote to CNN specifically. Obviously people can be woken up, and I don't really think most people are bad at heart. There has to be something that just smashes right through the conditioning and the cognitive dissonance and draws out the good in people instead of exploiting it.

Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 3:05 a.m. No.9740932   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9740916

>What must be completed to engage MI over other (3) letter agencies

During the 1950s and 60s, federal troops and federalized National

Guard forces, accompanied by military intelligence personnel, were

deployed to help integrate Southern schools23 and to help deal with

civil disorders in Detroit in 1967 and other cities the following year

after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.24 Throughout

this period military intelligence units also continued to collect data on

Americans at home who were suspected of involvement in subversive

activities.25 In the late 1960s, the Pentagon compiled personal

information on more than 100,000 politically active Americans in an

effort to quell civil rights and anti-Vietnam War demonstrations and

to discredit protestors.26 The Army used 1,500 plainclothes agents to

watch demonstrations, infiltrate organizations, and spread

disinformation. 2

' According to one report, the Army had at least one

observer at every demonstration of more than twenty people.28

The Army's activities were summed up by Senator Sam Ervin:

Allegedly for the purpose of predicting and preventing

civil disturbances which might develop beyond the control of

state and local officials, Army agents were sent throughout

the country to keep surveillance over the way the civilian

population expressed their sentiments about government

policies. In churches, on campuses, in classrooms, in public

meetings, they took notes, tape-recorded, and photographed

people who dissented in thought, word, or deed. This included clergymen, editors, public officials, and anyone who

sympathized with the dissenters.

 

http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6053&context=lalrev

 

>Hahahaha, Trump has had MI infiltrate Antifa and all the dissenting local govts.

 

Always 5 steps ahead!

Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 3:10 a.m. No.9740947   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0965

>>9740929

>Lots of Middle Eastern men are in on this force. They're all being actively paid and have weapons and training.

Not trying to be discriminatory in the least here; this is a global movement and WWG1WGA….

…but with Obama it really does seem to always have an element of Islamic terrorism. The importation of all those refugees into Minnesota and Michigan, Omar and co., the AK47 pic, Founder of ISIS, etc.

Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 3:24 a.m. No.9740999   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1017

>>9740946

Fair enough. I guess if it were that easy we wouldn't be necessary, would we?

I'm just thinking of my own personal life here. I'm in Cali. Surrounded by good, noble, intelligent people who I respect who are nonetheless brainwashed drones. They aren't bad people at heart; the opposite, actually, which is why I actually care what they think.

These guys put on CNN and MSNBC as background noise during family gatherings or visits or just to lounge around. The level of trust they have for these voices and faces is such that they use them as a calming and relaxing presence for rest and leisure, which suggests to me that there is absolutely no barrier between what is said/shown and what they accept.

I can watch those opinions get uploaded in real-time. If the anchor says "Trump wants a Banana Republic," then people who have never once used that phrase in conversation before will suddenly be saying "Banana Republic" by the end of the day. If the anchor says "hope" and "change" every other sentence, even outside the context of Obama, then by the end of the day they'll remark that Obama was a better president, whether Obama was mentioned/shown or not.

My favorite example was during the Kavanaugh show trial. They used the words "credible witness" so many times that they began saying that she was "incredibly credible." The word "credible" stuck THAT hard.

The best I can do is point out the crap in real-time. For example, just saying "hope" or "change" out loud every time Don Lemon does and hoping they notice. But then I'm a killjoy because I'm ruining the soothing comfort of his face and voice with my skepticism. People do not enjoy cognitive dissonance.

Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 3:25 a.m. No.9741004   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9740965

>It started under Bush II, not Obama. Obama just kept it going and increased funding

No shocker there, it's been obvious for a while that these guys are on the same side.

Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 3:37 a.m. No.9741044   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1052 >>1060 >>1064

>>9741017

I need to get better at the soft redpill. I'm inclined to just rip apart people's delusions and that only makes them distressed and uncomfortable.

Example:

>"How could Trump hold up the Bible like that? He's never even read it."

>"How do you know that?"

>"I just know."

>"How? Did CNN tell you that?"

>"No! I just KNOW!"

>"You THINK. You have nothing whatsoever to back it up."

>"IKNOW!"

>"Based on what? Prove to me that Trump has never read the Bible."

>"STOP ARGUING WITH ME!"

At this point I'm inclined to just rewind back to the part of today's broadcast and show them that, indeed, some stupid anchor said it and now they think it. But they're already enraged.

Clearly this isn't effective.

Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 3:49 a.m. No.9741093   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1108

>>9741064

It's not just an example. That was a word-for-word argument I had. I have a background in debate and I need to recognize that it's actually pretty counterproductive.

But the goal will never be anything except to challenge those ideas. I just need a better method.

Anonymous ID: e771cd June 25, 2020, 4:01 a.m. No.9741144   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9741108

I mean, I try to be civil. I could be a bigger jerk than I am.

>"Trump can't do this! We have a Constitution!"

>"What has Trump done that violates the Constitution? What part of it did he violate?"

is a little better than what I wanted to go with, which was:

>"What is the preamble to the United States Constitution? Don't look it up. Tell me right now since you know it so well or I know your argument was made in bad faith."

I'm at least making progress. Just have to control my temper and resist the urge to show how stupid what they think is. People never admit when they're wrong, even if they know it, even though morally they should immediately. They have to come to that conclusion themselves.

The thing is, people lash out at me for just asking questions, too. They get anxious the instant they see where the train of logic is heading and just turn hostile.

I'm not defending being a pedantic jerk. Genuinely trying to stop. Just trying to explain the problems I have.