>The chat below this one in the article shows infant mortality rate dropping… but no link to where they got the data for the chart.
SAUCE:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6919e2.htm?s_cid=mm6919e2_x
(long) Guardian hit piece on QAnon 25 June 2020
Down the rabbit hole: how QAnon conspiracies thrive on Facebook
A Guardian investigation has documented:
More than 100 Facebook pages, profiles, groups, and Instagram accounts with at least 1,000 followers or members each dedicated to QAnon.
The largest of these have more than 150,000 followers or members.
In total, the documented pages, groups and accounts count more than 3m aggregate followers and members, though there is likely significant overlap among these groups and accounts.
…
Moreover, Facebook is not merely providing a platform to QAnon groups. Its powerful algorithms are actively recommending them to users who may not otherwise have been exposed to them.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jun/25/qanon-facebook-conspiracy-theories-algorithm
Source appears to be here:
https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/mortality.html
But it looks like they graphed it themselves.
>Has anyone figured out yet the real strategy behind this move?
It's there in your quote anon:
>based on the information I have today,