Anonymous ID: ee1ff9 June 25, 2020, 5:10 a.m. No.9741400   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1410

>>9741323

>Elliot separates people according to their eye color.

If anything, she proved the effectiveness of the divide & conquer strategy.

> even though being aware of taking part in a workshop, disagree, argue with each other and cry, not being able to cope or stand the situation

The emotional reactions might have something to do with this

> She first conducted her famous exercise for her class on April 5, 1968, the day after Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated.

 

>they never know how deep is the repression and outcasting which they help to create by doing nothing against it and conforming with the current situation.

You can't make those conclusions by putting people in those situations without factoring in that the experiment was undertaken a day after a collective traumatic experience.

>"provides stiff medicine on the psychological assumptions girding racist attitudes and behavior",

No, it proves that when people are divided in any sort of arbitrary fashion and one group is put in power over another, shit happens.

Gotta love Marxist science.

Anonymous ID: ee1ff9 June 25, 2020, 5:15 a.m. No.9741415   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1431 >>1514

>>9741390

>Is the POSITIVE PERCENTAGE INCREASING???

What's the error rates of those tests?

Those numbers matter to people who test positive and are subject to draconian measures for testing positive.

Anonymous ID: ee1ff9 June 25, 2020, 5:34 a.m. No.9741535   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9741496

Intubation could account for them getting worse despite being COVID negative.

>There are definitely false positives, which means the more you check non-tested/negatively-tested people, the more positive results you will get and thus you can continue with the fear porn that way.

Right. And until people start questioning the accuracy of these tests, the fear porn will continue.

Anonymous ID: ee1ff9 June 25, 2020, 5:50 a.m. No.9741611   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9741514

>math matters…

So does consistency.

Error rates are not consistent on a day-to-day basis due to a wide variety of tests being used, each with a different error rate.

The testing statistics are flawed both on a macro scale (what you've noted) and on a micro scale (error rates contributing to false positives).

Both are not being addressed.