>>9743403 (lb)
Never said I didn't trust my source, just hate using it because the author is a bit snarky. Considering how long people have been deceived, I sort of understand it, though. Refute anything in that short clip. It's 6:36 long.
>>9743448 (lb)
These are statements not backed with fact, though. It's taken on belief. The people that wrote the texts in red never heard Jesus actually speak the words. This coming from a red-text believer, mind you.
>>9743284 (lb)
This seems highly plausible. If any evidence exists that places Jesus in their company, we'd have an actual historical account outside of the quotes from Josephus that are debunked or never actually mention Jesus directly (only Christus, and that's only in the context of his believers that abide by his teachings). None of these historians manage to name Jesus specifically in any of their writings.
There's also the problem of reconciling the books that got left out, like the Book of Giants, Enoch, and Jubilees, with the final draft of the combination of books that make up the Holy Bible.
I'm really surprised Texas haven't gone all "Texan" on him yet.
LOTS going on. I dug so much I found honeypots on twitter. That's when I realized that patriots are all over this stuff. Relieved, to say the least.
Reposting:
Secretary Pompeo's remarks on Trafficking in Persons Report Release - 2:00 PM
"But can we prove it?"
That's an economy booster. Giving ppl the money directly just feeds China $$ with new tv, computer, and cell phone purchases.
For the election, anon. Q's said it many times already. That was the sole purpose of the murders. The election.