>>9744194 (lb Q)
Yeah, 11.3 is going to be big, isn't it, Q?
Not every single model is a play thing to the elite, anon. Just many of them, unfortunately.
Yeah, took me a minute to see what was happening at the time. I was convinced of other unfounded theories floating around (which pisses me off at myself, but whatever). It was a setup by @POTUS to demonstrate (at some point in time in the future) that these D govs were either grossly incompetent, or purposefully sending people into situations (nursing homes) where they knew they'd incur losses of life.
But like Q said:
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 40a8a4 No.9647518 📁
Jun 17 2020 14:05:01 (EST)
https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1272661471382700032📁
It's not what you know but what you can prove.
Q: can we prove it?
Q: can we prove coordination?
Q: can we prove deliberate action to inc death count to justify vote-by-mail, stay-at-home, bail-out-state, kill-economy, kill-P-rallies, inc unemployment, etc?
Q
>Was there no way to strongly urge/force cuomo to cease his actions that killed so many elderly?
So, this is another that is going to take folks a while to comprehend/deal with. If patriots calling the shots knew that certain govs/mayors would react in the way they did, then that means that patriots had to make some really difficult decisions in order for things to line up with the Plan. Namely, they had to go along with it.
Now Q passed this off as "Show instead of Tell". You can make of that what you will (lots of people have, and debates still ensues), but in the end, lots of anons aren't going to be able to get past that. Lots of anons are still up-in-arms over it. For this very reason, actually, there will be a few folks that I can never wake up, completely, with the truth. Tough decisions. Really tough.
Information Warfare doesn't stop in the realm of ideas. It costs lives, too.
When this guy gets the gavel back: