>>974637

Thank you TechExperts from a Research&InfoDistributor Luddite.

>>982172

Correction: Research-er

>>978833

>>978477

>>982172

Thank you TechExperts from a Researcher&InfoDistributor Luddite.

>>974690

>>974637

>>978477

>>978833

Brilliant. This was what I was asking for.

1. It should linked to at the top of each new bread's Resources,

AND

1. on first page of qresearch index with the "ARCHIVE, ARCHIVE, ARCHIVE EVERYTHING OFFLINE" instructions for "newfags"/"normies".

>>974637 (OP)

>>978477

>>978833

>>983930

A serious question: How would a clever anon go about saving a person of interest's entire twitter feed from inception, including pics, in case of deletion?

I get the feeling that these methods can narrow select/focus the file folder to be copied, yes?

>>984291

>>974637

>>978477

>>978833

>>983930

>>877198

>>122807

>>93735

>>3138

Thanks for your reply.

I know that it is possible to copy a particular Twitter discussion thread by printing a pdf, or by using 'ThreadReader' I think it is called, but again this is only for one discussion thread, not the root or branches, and in this case only if Twitter author allows it.

So the challenge for non-Tech anons like me is to find an easy technical way to copy all roots and branch discussion threads of a particular person/institution without copying absolutely everyone on Twitter.

Maybe there is an easy solution, if so great, that is why I am asking.

Thanking all anons in advance for their patience, consideration, and time.

We all know of instances where evidence has disappeared before archiving.

Non-Tech Anons need to archive particular person's/institution's complete thread discussions for possible use as evidence etc.

>>987185

Welcome!

A very useful, thoughtful first post. Not everyone can say that.

Sounds great.

I got nothing for Twitter now apart from pdf-printers so hell yeah, I'd love to test it if you're up for it. Anything is better than nothing. Thank you for your reply.

>>987352

Thanks very much for your detailed and useful post with easy to read, easy to follow explanations. Really great work.

Ok, I will try to follow through with all the kind anons' advice and test on sites and Twitter.

Thank you all anons :)

>>987185

>>987352

>>984291

>>983930

>>978833

>>978477

>>974637

You guys are like geniuses.

Gotta learn some coding.

>>974732

lol

>>987606

Good advice, thank you.

For legal evidence archiving, do both a pdf print and program site scrape for context.

Both a pdf print and a site scrape may be necessary for court admission to prevent defense lawyers throwing out good evidence.

In reality I hope that our backups won't be needed for court cases, but better safe than sorry.

Almost any personal pain is worth it so see these legions of evil people be served the justice they rightfully deserve for their disgusting crimes.

We have it easy, think of the multitudes of victims who have no voice, and rely on us and other good people to investigate and give them a voice.

Let alone our relatives and the dead from the world wars, or more recent affairs. The scars are deep.

>>987712 Thanks lol, very droll, my searches were no use

>>987798 Thanks, will try

>>987830 Thanks, good point. Will experiment.

>>987840 Thank you. This might be the most elegant solution, but without pdf-print and timestamp. I will try this too. Thanks.

>>987937

Some other anons used arc hiv e.is for the first archives, but then switched to Meg aU plo ad.

Your work sounds very useful and pretty cool tbh, so I would still love to try it if you're ok with that. I don't know anything about locking down the plain-text source so it doesn't get f-d with. I assume that once it is there on Me gaU pl oad for example, then it is safe from alteration?

Gotta start some coding.