>>9752000 (pb)
> As many times as Q has posted pretty exact Trump and Q post if they were not related Trump would pretty much be under an obligation to publically disavow such talk.
What are you saying here? Not trying to be a grammar commie here, but i legit have problem reading that sentence.
Why would Trump need to disavow that? There are millions of messages deposited on the internet every second. It could be a coinicdence, and since there is no 1-on-1 between the messages, it's more likely to be a coincidence.