>>975295

Good post.

>>975314

On a side: You cannot evacuate persons, only buildings. Evacuate means "emptying".

>>975322

> Does it also imply Cohen knew about the incendiary?

Well, read the article (again):

It doesn't say this.

>>975356

Is that your only concern?

The answer is: no.

>>975526

>Did UK/GER respond? Sounds like time's up..

Respond to what exactly, in your opinion?

>>975544

Yes…

>>975570

>Quit jumping to conclusions that Cohen knew,

>or flipped.

And the article gives no reason, to jump to this conclusion.

What is "on other websites too"?

And did Q mention "other websites" or specifically this NYT article?

>>975587

>>975636

The article in the NYT doesn't imply with any word that Cohen had foreknowledge or whatever.

Quote, where the article says that.

>>975690

And what does the text encircled in red tell you?

>>975738

I can follow your thoughts here.

Maybe I'm too rational; I just read the article as being a big nothing burger. No substance, not worth the read.

>>975755

Whoever wants to start a war, is a criminal.

States know that kind of tactic.

They won't fall for this,

except if they WANT to "fall" for this.

>>975838

Fake and gay. Debunked in weekend breads.

>>975917

This attorney says "Trump did it".

Q shows us an article making a lot of Anons believe "Cohen did it".

Each side wants to convince us of something.

No side provides any evidence.