I am inferring from other anons that if you have 400 firefighters on scene in a chaotic situation, it would not be a challenge for an infiltrator to get access to somewhere normally not accessible, under pretense of the emergency.
Yes, and it doesn't explicitly say that Cohen knew in advance, it's just written in such a way to lead the reader that way.
Could be that Cohen had heard the news and was calling to check up on a friend that could have been in the building.
Could be that the friend thought it was a minor incident, called Cohen so he could inform POTUS, after all he would want to know, right? and Cohen told him "that sounds dangerous, you'd better get out".
Note that Q says "read carefully".
That confirms to me that the article is written specifically to give you a certain impression upon first reading, but when you actually read it literally you realize that you are implying something that is not actually stated.
I agree – It doesn't explicitly say that he had foreknowledge.
However, it sneakily implies it in the way it is written. It's written in a misleading way.
"What, you thought that's what we meant? We just innocently said that Cohen sent a text message." Libel defense.