Good morning, anons.
Do we by any chance have a screenshot of the Julia Carriew tweet that Q posted last night?
I see her tweets are protected now…
Ok thanks. I should go back to bed.
Some things to add to the swirling Tucker conversation:
Watched Tucker for many years. I've always found him to be sincere and I do believe he loves this country and hates the left. But I've also noticed a number of blind spots in his thinking over the years. Tucker has never been a neocon, but he did fall for some of the lies that led us to the War in Iraq, only to publicly regret it later. He's never struck me as a full-blown nationalist, though he is firmly opposed to Wall Street and corporate cronyism. For older anons or history buffs, he strikes me as part of what used to be called the "dumb right" (a term coined to describe the anti-FDR movement)…no, I'm not saying that he or the right is "dumb"…but the term was meant to describe people on the right who were united for various reasons but didn't have any consistent political philosophy or program like the socialists did…they were more reactionary in nature which, I think, is a VERY healthy thing.
But this sometimes leads, as I stated before, to blind spots, and sometimes these blind spots can be severe. We're mostly conservatives and libertarians on this board. As Constitutionalists, we recognize that we can NOT ask the federal government to violate the principles of federalism, and I suspect many of us have spent years trying to explain to people that, although terrorism is bad, we should not surrender one single constitutional right to fight. It must be done properly which means "by the book." Central governments looking to expand their power through origination or usurping authority from the states is the very heart of our movement…because it's the reason we're in this mess in the first place. And it's easy to lost sight of that, especially as more and more is revealed about the "nature of the entrenchment." But if we succumb to temptation, then we may damn future generations while we fix today's problems. Trump's restraint in the face of the riots is telling, because it shows me he understands this. And by now, you should all be aware that Trump is the opposite of Teddy R who said "speak softly and carry a big stick." DJT prefers to be a blowhard who carries a foldout negotiation table. It works for him…look at NK and all the rhetoric only to be followed by actual negotiations, something that no other president accomplished.
Trump can and may use federal force to quell insurrection eventually, but this is a very serious step and should not be taken lightly. The Constitution reserves police power to the states themselves. This is LAW. Unfortunately, Tucker doesn't understand. He's fallen prey to a major blind spot. Remember - Tucker has had mobs outside his house, threatening his family..I'm sure this has affected him in a big way, but we must follow the Constitution or this is all for naught. The enemy knows that constitution-minded individuals make up a large portion of Trump's base, and showing military force domestically would likely peel off enough supporters to end his tenure. Remember the Civil War..it was not until federal troops marched into Virginia that most of the other southern states seceded. There is something frightening and surreal about federal troops marching through your communities to protect you, and we should keep that in mind. I believe that's why Q told us in the beginning that they were going to have to use the military (the only way) - this wasn't a pep rally, but serious warning. Q knows who populates this board and where their minds are at.
Tucker doesn't get this, but I don't he's comp'd or a shill, but I could be wrong. We DO need to stay grounded, however, in the LAW and not allow emotion or passion to govern our analysis and expectations. Tucker has forgotten that.
I'm in your boat, working for a major "woke" company. I've been required to attend townhalls and department-led discussions on "racism" and the like. Despite living in a red-state where virtually everything is open, I am still working from home and likely will be indefinitely. My department is mostly people who are left of center..not radicals, but normies that just believe everything CNN tells them. Good news: I'm starting to see some minor cracks in their thinking; some confusion beginning to set in. I see it as a positive development.
And simply can not buy that they are going to run Biden against Trump. He's just a placeholder and will step down and allow the anointed one to step in, and the MSM will play up the groundswell of enthusiasm for the savior of the Dem party who will vanquish Trump forever…part of their plan to work in concert with election fraud to make the whole thing believable.
Fair points…my own verbosity may have clouded my original intent, which was to show people that what Tucker is pushing insofar as the indiscriminate use of federal force is not in our interest nor the Constitution's.