dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

>>9755534 (pb)

1) FOIA request would have to be sent to each county (unless in your state the type of machine used is uniform throughout the whole state). FOIA to state SOS on type of paper.

2) FOIA request for the contracts.

Also review state statutes, which outline the procedures for creating ballots. Each state's SOS would probably be involved in design/layout (ballot uniformity), and each county has to make sure the ballot is compatible with the type of tabulating machine in use in that county.

You will probably find a section called "ballots,printing" that indicated the deadline for printing.

In some states - in person ballots are printing one-by-one as the voter checks in.

3) Challengers aren't allowed to even touch the absentee ballots. Only the absentee ballot election board. If corrupt and they felt a difference in the paper would they say anything?

4) Public databases. Hmm, how about looking at the budget for the SOS offices and compare how much paper they ordered for the primary, vs what they order for the general? But it wouldn't matter - can't compare to 2016 or 2018 election.

>This isn't about ballot/vote counting or validation or voting machines.

Every federal election is followed by an audit of the ballot/vote counting, but it is a sampling, not a full audit. I figure "they" know that and don't cheat there. As a result, is the paper absentee ballot a place to focus?

So why does POTUS focus us on the paper and the printing?

I'll be thinking about that as auditanon wraps things up.

The next thing is who are the excess ballots going to be mailed to? Voter history files, public record. Not who they voted for, just if they voted and in which elections.