lb >>9764949
true, c_a has sorta bad rep, think movies and how they are often glamorized though.
Potus uses c_a (powers) moar often than one would think. not so much the old system, but the agency and all the VAST powers it is Legally granted.
Potus used c_a to take down solemeini, he will use his trusted peops but the powers are too much to let go to waste.
we need honest postal workers to help!
postal inspectors have good resources to help on this stuff, as they did in this case me thinks!
yeah 50 cal and grenades.
i will add also re. Parler that unlike twitter it does not seem you can lurk w/out an account, you can bypass the phone requirement by reg screen and aying you forgot password and requesting via email, but it defaults to giving you a sign up code via txt.
power is who controls the bulk commodities in essence, the holder of the traded commodities have the ability to decide what they will sell/trade necessities for. everything is rooted in bulk trading, from paper to food to energy, up the supply chain those who control the markets for such decide which (money) to accept.
this is designed and is a key step in how clowns take over foreign countries, a new alternative currency is introduced and they give it value, while devaluing the nations currency so you need a box of money to buy a bag of flour, but just one of the new (notes).
by controlling the raw products they control it all.
the idea is not so much real value as destroying what they want destroyed and suppressing their competitors to take them over.
so if their enemies have unlimited gold they may decide to not accept gold so their enemies/competitors weaken and can be conquered due to lack of resources.
the game varies but the money changers control the raw commodities and the free markets end when they want it to.
Illinois Gun Permit Applications Soar 500% As Frightened Liberals Embrace 2nd Amendment
Election 2020 Focus: Independents and Constitutional Protections:
1- 2A Dems have made position clear a) defund police b) reduce ability to defend oneself and family.
2- Religious Freedom: Protests (essential), Church (non-essential)
3- Potus: Law & Order fighting hard to protect citizens from the Dem Party Communist Tactics
4- Potus Welcoming an Opportunity to Liberate Minorities from Dem suppression and Fear Based Narratives, Reduce crimes of Dem cities by voting them out.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/illinois-gun-permit-applications-soar-500-frightened-liberals-embrace-2nd-amendment
fyi-
me thinks the notes and meeting were Jan 5.
not sure though, except citing below article.
was there a Jan 4 meeting and where?
I have a column up on the homepage today about developments in the Flynn case. In the main, I address a new revelation: The Justice Department has just disclosed to Sidney Powell, General Michael Flynn’s attorney, handwritten notes attributed to fired FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok. The notes describe a meeting very early in 2017 that included discussion of the Bureau’s then-ongoing investigation of Flynn. The participants were the political and law-enforcement leadership of the Obama administration: President Obama, Vice President Biden, national-security adviser Susan Rice, deputy attorney general Sally Yates, and FBI director James Comey.
As I explain in the column, there has been some confusion in the commentary about Strzok’s notes, in particular regarding the date of the meeting and whether there was more than one meeting. We already knew that the five just-mentioned officials had met on January 5, 2017. But a submission to the court by Ms. Powell dated Strzok’s notes on January 4, thus suggesting that there had been a meeting on a date earlier than January 5 (presumably January 4), in which the same five participants discussed the same topic. (Obviously, if Strzok’s notes are from January 4, they could not describe a meeting that didn’t happen until January 5.)
To the contrary, I have contended that the Strzok notes are actually about the January 5 meeting, meaning they can’t be from January 4.
Attorney general Bill Barr appears to have confirmed that the notes relate to the January 5 meeting. He appeared on Verdict with Ted Cruz, a podcast the senator hosts along with Michael Knowles. The episode is here, and the relevant discussion begins a little more than 16 minutes in. While the discussion confirms that the notes describe some of what was discussed at the January 5 White House meeting, it left unaddressed whether Strzok was present (I do not believe he was) and, assuming he wasn’t, who might have briefed Strzok about the meeting. (I suspect the notes, which are very sketchy, are third-hand, at best.)
As I explain in the column, the notes could be significant in the sense that they are additional confirmation of an important meeting. They do not, however, tell us anything of significance that we did not already know from other documents already disclosed.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/ag-barr-confirms-strzok-notes-are-for-january-5-white-house-meeting/
trying to look at it also re. date
heres a good thread w/theories i am reading now.
https://twitter.com/DawsonSField/status/1275813073404809216
i am sorta thinking strzok was working for clowns on a takedown Op and WH mtg was cover for it all, to insulate ALL from brennan and bho ordering clown op domestically.