Anonymous ID: 58a750 June 27, 2020, 11:54 a.m. No.9768160   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>9767549 (lb)

Nice, anon. So perhaps they are trying to avoid a super majority, then ?

 

United States

Federal government

 

The Constitution of the United States requires supermajorities in order for certain significant actions to occur.[33]

 

Amendments to the Constitution may be proposed in one of two ways: a two-thirds supermajority votes of each house of United States Congress or a convention called by Congress on application of two thirds (currently 34) of the states. Once proposed, the amendment must be ratified by three quarters (currently 38) of the states (either through the State legislatures, or ratification conventions, whichever "mode of ratification" Congress selects).

 

Congress may pass bills by simple majority votes. If the president vetoes a bill, Congress may override the veto by a two-thirds supermajority of both houses.

 

A treaty must be ratified by a two-thirds supermajority of the Senate to enter into force and effect.

 

Section 4 of the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution gives Congress a role to play in the event of a presidential disability. If the vice president and a majority of the president's cabinet declare that the president is unable to serve in that role, the vice president becomes acting president. Within 21 days of such a declaration (or, if Congress is in recess when a president is disabled, 21 days after Congress reconvenes), Congress must vote by two-thirds supermajorities to continue the disability declaration; otherwise, such declaration expires after the 21 days and the president would at that time "resume" discharging all the powers and duties of the office. (Section 4 has been invoked – the president himself declaring an inability – only three times.)

 

The House may, by a simple majority vote, impeach a federal official (such as, but not limited to, the president, vice president, or a federal judge). Removal from office (and optional disqualification from any Federal, State or local office) requires a two-thirds supermajority of the Senate. In 1842, the House failed to impeach president John Tyler. In 1868, the Senate fell one vote short of removing president Andrew Johnson following his impeachment. In 1999, efforts to remove Bill Clinton following his impeachment in 1998 fell just short of a simple majority, and 17 votes short of the two-thirds supermajority. The impeachment procedure was last used in 2019–20, when president Donald Trump was impeached and subsequently acquitted. Each chamber may expel one of its own members by a two-thirds supermajority vote; this last happened when the House expelled James Traficant in 2002.

 

The 14th Amendment (section 3) bars a person from Federal or State office if, after having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution as a Federal or State officer, "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof". However, both the House and Senate may jointly override this restriction with a two-thirds supermajority vote each.

 

A two-thirds supermajority in the Senate is 67 out of 100 senators, while a two-thirds supermajority in the House is 290 out of 435 representatives. However, since many votes take place without every seat in the House filled and representative participating, it does not often require 67 senators or 290 representatives to achieve this supermajority.

 

Apart from these constitutional requirements, a Senate rule (except in cases covered by the nuclear option, or of a rule change) requires an absolute supermajority of three fifths to move to a vote through a cloture motion, which closes debate on a bill or nomination, thus ending a filibuster by a minority of members. In current practice, the mere threat of a filibuster prevents passing almost any measure that has less than three-fifths agreement in the Senate, 60 of the 100 senators if every seat is filled.

Anonymous ID: 58a750 June 27, 2020, 12:18 p.m. No.9768356   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>9767805

>>9767825

Sometimes I think I'm completely ignored or shadowbanned, or whatever. I'll put it out there again. The County owns them. They are gov't property. If you read up on them, you'll find out they were financed and built by someone working under a pseudonym, and once the project was completed, the property (and the stones themselves) were handed over to the county.

 

Taking these things down is against the law; literally. Now what you could do, if you live in the county, is petition the county to remove them. But good look pulling that maneuver off in the "deep" south where every town has 2-3 mason lodges, and everyone on the council was allowed to be elected by people in control.

Anonymous ID: 58a750 June 27, 2020, 12:23 p.m. No.9768398   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>9768187

What makes you think that?

 

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 66o6MRSe No.150565108 πŸ“

Nov 23 2017 00:27:53 (EST)

 

Anonymous ID: G9U7adoa No.150564270 πŸ“

Nov 23 2017 00:19:48 (EST)

>>150563756

Holy shit. All of the president's past tweets making that reference.

 

"MUSK. You magnificent bastard, Q read your BOOK!"

 

>>150564270

Do you believe in coincidences?

Q