Anonymous ID: cd5c7e June 27, 2020, 6:15 p.m. No.9771584   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1638

Maybe Another ACCIDENT like Aug 8 2019

BREAKING - Sensors in Sweden have detected a rise in nuclear particles from somewhere near on or near the Baltic Sea. The Stockholm monitoring station detected 3isotopes; Cs-134, Cs-137 & Ru-103 associated with nuclear fission at higher than usual levels.

 

https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2019/08/13/an-explosion-a-spike-in-radiation-evacuation-preparations-what-exactly-happened-in-russia/

MOSCOW — At around 6 a.m. GMT on Aug. 8, seismic and acoustic sensors in Sweden, Finland and Norway detected an explosion. The sensors are operated by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, and on Monday the group — which monitors the globe for prohibited nuclear tests — said four stations identified an event “coinciding” with an explosion in Nyonoksa, Russia.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_nuclear_accidents

 

8 August 2019 State Central Navy Testing Range near Nyonoksa Explosive destruction of a nuclear power source Main article: Nyonoksa radiation accident.

According to the version presented by Russian officials, it was a result of a failed test of an "isotope power source for a liquid-fuelled rocket engine".[71][72][73] Nonproliferation expert Jeffrey Lewis and Federation of American Scientists fellow Ankit Panda suspect the incident resulted from a test of the Burevestnik cruise missile.[74] However, other arms control experts disputed the assertions; Ian Williams of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace expressed skepticism over Moscow's financial and technical capabilities to field the weapon[75], while Michael Kofman of the Wilson Center concluded that the explosion was probably not related to Burevestnik but instead to the testing of another military platform.[76] According to CNBC, the Russians were trying to recover a missile from the seabed which was lost during a previously failed test.[77]

Anonymous ID: cd5c7e June 27, 2020, 6:21 p.m. No.9771638   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1643 >>1671

>>9771584

Sensors detect rise in nuclear particles on Baltic Sea, global body says

Reuters Reuters•June 26, 2020

VIENNA (Reuters) - Radiation sensors in Stockholm have detected higher-than-usual but still harmless levels of isotopes produced by nuclear fission, probably from somewhere on or near the Baltic Sea, a body running a worldwide network of the sensors said on Friday.

 

The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) oversees a network of hundreds of monitoring stations that use seismic, hydroacoustic and other technology to check for a nuclear weapon test anywhere in the world. That technology can, however, be put to other uses as well.

 

One of its stations scanning the air for radionuclides - telltale radioactive particles that can be carried long distances by the wind - detected unusually high levels of three radionuclides earlier this week: caesium-134, caesium-137 and ruthenium-103.

 

The Stockholm monitoring station "detected 3isotopes; Cs-134, Cs-137 & Ru-103 associated w/Nuclear fission @ higher[ ] than usual levels (but not harmful for human health)", CTBTO chief Lassina Zerbo said on Twitter (https://twitter.com/SinaZerbo/status/1276559857731153921?s=20) on Friday evening.

 

The particles were detected on "22/23 June", he added.

 

Zerbo's post included a borderless map showing where the particles might have come from in the 72 hours before they were detected - a large area (https://twitter.com/SinaZerbo/status/1276559857731153921/photo/1) covering the tips of Denmark and Norway as well as southern Sweden, much of Finland, Baltic countries and part of western Russia including St Petersburg.

 

"These are certainly nuclear fission products, most likely from a civil source," a spokeswoman for the Vienna-based CTBTO said, referring to the atomic chain reaction that generates heat in a nuclear reactor.

 

"We are able to indicate the likely region of the source, but it's outside the CTBTO's mandate to identify the exact origin," she added.