Any Anons know how to examine a video for evidence of Snapchat-style filters? This video of Hillary looks like a GAN/filter, not real: https://twitter.com/KarluskaP/status/1276730458320121856
If it is a fake, why make a fake video? Why wouldn't the real Hillary be around to do one? Hmm…
Could be. Or, they could've put old blood into [their] supplies. There was an article a while back that some liberal website put out, with research on how old blood made rats age and succumb to age-related diseases, while young blood revitalized them. They tried the experiment with humans and gave young blood to older people. It revitalized them. They didn't try the reverse with humans. But, what if someone did it to [their] supply? Imagine living with young blood in your veins from transfusions for a lifetime, then getting 90-year-old blood. It's like biological whiplash. They would've fallen apart.
That was my thinking in regards to the Q post about [them] not being able to walk down the street. What if they literally couldn't manage anymore? They couldn't walk? They aged so quickly, like adult-onset progeria, from getting a jolt of old blood instead of young blood and just fell the fuck apart?
Anons were suggesting that [they] got given the virus in their blood (or adrenochrome) supply, but what if they didn't have to give them the virus? What if they just used old, decrepit blood instead? It would've shocked their system and caused them to age, potentially very rapidly. They wouldn't be recognizable.
It's also a lot easier to hide how old blood is, as opposed to the presence/absence of viruses. They could've scanned old blood for viruses and found nothing, but young blood contaminated with a virus they could've caught in safety procedures.
There are billions more people than there used to be. If every soul is an old soul that used to exist, then how is it that there are so many more than there used to be? The math doesn't work. Unless there are new souls. And, if there are new souls, then they aren't reincarnated ones.
The argument on souls is a little shaky, as well. The same argument that was used to prove the different sizes of infinity could be used to establish that unless the universe could create new energy (which violates the rule that energy is neither created nor destroyed, merely transformed), the progressive creation of new souls which would not be reused or recycled or any such thing, would eventually deplete the energy in the known universe.