Anonymous ID: 0d7c44 June 28, 2020, 6 a.m. No.9775183   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5198 >>5431

If the DEMOCRATS are the NEW CONFEDERATES!!

 

CAN WE START SAYING VOTE FOR "TRUMP"

 

Or

 

YOU CAN VOTE FOR A CONFEDERATE(JOE BIDEN) ….THE CHOICE IS YOUR'S

 

how many will make the connection

Anonymous ID: 0d7c44 June 28, 2020, 6:09 a.m. No.9775236   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5364

>>9775198

The debate over whether the plantation South was capitalist depends largely on one’s definition of capitalism. If wage labor is the prima facie condition for capitalism, then the plantation South was not capitalist. If capitalism means the application of commodified labor for producing exports to distant markets in exchanges undergirded by sanctified private property, sophisticated credit instruments, and profit-seeking, then the plantation South was capitalist. Very quickly, the outcome hinges on the definition of capitalism (a theoretical issue) rather than on the careful study of the social relations and economic practices of the slaveholding regime (an empirical inquiry). Drawing on Marxist categories has proven especially vexing, for, as Walter Johnson observes, “it is, after all, this intellectual tradition that has most actively kept alive the idea that when you talk about ‘capitalism’ and ‘slavery’ you are talking about two things, rather than one.

 

https://www.journalofthecivilwarera.org/forum-the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies/the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies-slavery-and-capitalism/