>>9775825

lately even if you dare to suggest that, hey, it's so obvious to everyone else why do you folk go on about 'that group' that other group, all the bait-groupings?

and if you say 'oh ya, it's obvious'.

they don't take it as an observation, they take it as war against 'their kind'. And 'what kind is that?' one might ask, 'the unkind'.

and just because so many of them happen to also be what you delude I see you as, not as the rptile minded idiot that you pander to be . . .

that I dare to say ' we know, we always know, you never get away with it, we always see it, and you do too, and you know we do, and we know you know we know.

but if we dare to say . . . well 'they will be coming to your door.'

that's what they have stupped down to be, that guy, who makes a direct threat to someone random. whose just being mouthy on account of figuring some things out.

you make the mistake of making a general observation that also includes some of the crimes that they might think you imagine that they commit, even if you have no such imaginings. And then they are quick with the 'you are a . . . ' and 'off to the gulag'.

do they even look at themselves and ever self-reflect and say 'ewweeeh, I really am that guy. when did I turn from being sweet young . . .. into old bully . . .. ?'

let's hope they have that kind of interospection. I always see them as the good one, and the bad one is an act they do because they are scared that I'm a harmer, but I'm not.

so that is it.

they know we know they know we know (and that is dialog from a Friend's episode)

and they try and do the death by a thousand cuts bit, too.

but again, they do the bully thing because they are really just scared sheep, told to do it bye their masters. they have no real choice. Constant insults, and they woiuld just knock you down if they really could, or fling your typewriter off a bluff and over the mountain.

alter on they find out it killed someone?

they'd blame you.

haul them infront of a judge, but they paid all the fines.

ya it sucks having a chatty bitch 'bad writer' whose mouthy and goes on with the descriptive dead-on commentary even if it were pourly poured out onto the pages of time (like a sage acount of the depraved in the process of thinking that htey they are getting away with it).

a shill post has at least two and maybe more serious and horid assumptions and or insults within the first few phrases, followed by the use of pejoratives as nouns of address.

and continues to claim some kind of literary or intellectual superiority.

when faced with actually proficient writers, in spontaneious draft mode the bot is reduced to threats and insults, usually terse onliners, probably dialog from bully televsion of the 1950's and 1960's, when insulting family and friends and then pausing in the mode of a quip was called 'dead pan'. and people tried to emulate . . . Milton Burl (can you believe it)?