About the tracking and pics of tags from the late bread…

I work in retail. Those are RFID tags. They help with theft and have a unique identifier. HOWEVER unless the product that was bought also had a unique identifier, you wouldn't be able to track someone with these. Given that most things sold in stores don't have a unique identifier and instead have upc numbers that match a category of item (all black c32 push up bra with specific embroidery), the idea that companies can track you with this is indeed retarded.

BAKER, VICTORIA SECRET TRACKING IS NOT NOTABLE. PLEASE REMOVE FROM NOTABLES.

>>9784206

>>9784212

>>9784201

No. They have RFID tags that set off the sensors at the store's entrance. Most major retailers use them. They cannot be used to track you.

>>9784247

It can be used to detect how close the tag is to a sensor that emits a radio frequency which is at most 15 feet. It can't track your actual location. This is why sometimes you don't even need to pass through the sensors at the door to set off the alarms.

>>9784302

sauce it then because the other thing about these tags is that they are extremely sensitive. even a slight bent makes them useless so it would surprise me if [they] used them for anything other than retail security. also, because the tags are mass printed, multiple tags can share the same unique identifier, making it even more difficult to do any sort of effective tracking beyond the store.

>>9784362

Baker if you are going to include the RFID nonsense in the notables, at least include the discuss on its validity. See my post below.

>>9784201

>>9784424

the sauce is a simple over view of what RFID tags are and does not go into any detail of what tracking capabilities they have or don't have. its a slide. either get it out of notables or include the discussion.

>>9784450

the information that I provided is well known within the industry. you can google this shit which is exactly what I suspect the other anon did. furthermore there is a claim that is being made which is that RFIDs can be used to track you to more of a degree than what is publicly known. what you are asking for of me is to disprove an unproven claim. my point is that until more evidence is provided to support the original claim, then the discussion needs to be coupled with the notables. or do you want us to look like a bunch of paranoid freaks that the MSM loves to call us?

>>9784501

google it you lazy fuck. RFID has been around for years at this point. the tec is simple and used every where. almost all major retailers use them.

>>9784535

baker

you are the one pushing the claim that these are being used for more than just basic retail functions and won't include discussion of the topic. you want sauce? go into any major retailer. they all use this. any anon worth his/her salt can do a simple search about this to get the most basic understanding of the tec. stop being a faggot and include the discussion or get it the fuck out of the notables like any decent baker who can spot a slide a mile away would.

>>9784586

its not a waste if it stops some one from going off like a retard and saying the deeps state is tracking us through our bras when there hasn't been any evidence to support such a claim.

>>9784595

RFID tag usage is itself common sense. it is industry wide. asking me to sauce that is like asking someone to sauce the claim that the sky is blue. you can go see it for yourself.

>>9784603

its common practice and industry wide. anons are more than capable of looking this up with a simple google search. you, however, are still pushing the original unsubstantiated claim from the previous bread. where the fuck is your sauce baker? is this your faggot path?

>>9784614

its not just fashion. school supplies, books, home goods, etc. literally every where. its why stores have the sensors at the doors. that's the tec in question. I trust anons to be able to look it up for themselves.

>>9784637

baker seems to be pushing for either but doesn't want to include discussion.

>>9784632

I'm unhelpful? you are the one pushing deep state claims without sauce but then ask for sauce for something that is well known and easy for any anon to do a simple search. you are the one that is too lazy to include the discussion and then when called out on it, try to act virtuous with saying gay shit like "choosing your own path" bs. fuck off shill baker. KYS