>>9778683 (pb) (Q)
CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER
>Clear and present danger was a doctrine adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms of speech, press, or assembly. The test was replaced in 1969 with Brandenburg v. Ohio's "imminent lawless action" test.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_and_present_danger
LEGAL DEFINITION:
>A risk or threat to safety or other public interests that is serious and imminentespecially : one that justifies limitation of a right (as freedom of speech or press) by the legislative orexecutive branch of government
https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/clear and present danger
>POTUS may legally shut down the Fake News Media for all of the above reasons stated by Q
>POTUS may legally shut down ANTIFA and other domestic terror orgs for the above reasons stated by Q
>POTUS can even legally shut down the SPEECH of these people if he feels like it, although I feel like the 1st 2 apply more directly to this situation
Since the forces rallying to control and destroy us constitute a clear and present danger, POTUS may legally take harsh measures against the Fake News media and the rioters. Big news inbound.