How common are devices that can read an RFID tag? The tag itself carries a unique identifier that, when scanned by a device, would probably transmit location data back to a central database. Why is the person wearing the tag not informed about who is controlling the data being gathered? It's the same with pet chipping and all the other predatory tech. Consumers are forced to blindly trust the unknown persons who handle their data on their behalf. There is an assumption that anyone powerful enough to wield such a technology must be as benevolent as Jesus; at least that's what the marketers are banking on.
What does this have to do with bras? Are you suggesting that the tag in the bra has something to do with monitoring the inflation of the breasts?
>>9785371 Looks like an anti-theft device. Here is the deactivator:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Anti-Theft-Clothing-Store-EAS-Soft-Label-Deactivator-RF-Width-7-4-9-0MHz/153110863884?_trkparms=aid%3D1110012%26algo%3DSPLICE.SOIPOST%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20200420083544%26meid%3D6a0556e920a644da88ca2b767f6eb234%26pid%3D100008%26rk%3D2%26rkt%3D12%26sd%3D153017787650%26itm%3D153110863884%26pmt%3D1%26noa%3D0%26pg%3D2047675%26algv%3DPromotedSellersOtherItemsV2%26brand%3DUnbranded&_trksid=p2047675.c100008.m2219
It won't be Trump who forces it, it will be employers. It is private employers who forced everyone onto cashless banking by refusing to pay them otherwise; now it's remote third party apps that handle personal info. The career HR employment industry forced the cashless pay and will continue to forward the agenda. Getting hired now-a-days is little more than giving hr permission to market your personal information to benefits vendors. As if capitalizing on our labor making 3+ times more from our productivity than we do is not enough. They'll be the ones to require our DNA, location tracking data, political profile, submission to injection etc.