Anonymous ID: 125b91 June 29, 2020, 1:45 a.m. No.9784968   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4992 >>4994 >>5020 >>5054 >>5316

>>9784871 (/pb)

 

I suppose, working on your theory, if you want to track a pair of boobs you would need multiple listening stations within proximity to triangulate the coordinates in order to pinpoint someone’s location (or any other RFID-tagged product).

 

Similar to how GPS satellites work. Multiple satellites are used to calculate your location, not one. I find it hard to believe an RFID tag has greater capabilities than GPS receivers.

 

Otherwise as far as bras, not sure what kind of data can be generated from such a tag. Just because an RFID is put on an item, how does it know what data to receive, potentially store, process and transmit?

Anonymous ID: 125b91 June 29, 2020, 1:57 a.m. No.9785015   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5135

>>9784981

 

My point, as well as others, was this is used strictly for in-store tracking and not some universal geolocating tracking device and didn’t want the original notable to become shared all over social media as “you’re being geolocated wearing a bra” and was making it clear what the true purpose of it is.

 

You got some sauce which shows they tracked customers to their homes using RFID?

Anonymous ID: 125b91 June 29, 2020, 2:10 a.m. No.9785076   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9785020

 

You’re right. I am basing what I said on the information that is publicly available.

 

When you put it that way, who knows? After all, they do put RFID in passports, new driver’s licenses and even things like automobile tires.

Anonymous ID: 125b91 June 29, 2020, 2:14 a.m. No.9785094   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9785054

 

Exactly. I know that. I guess what I was trying to get at, and it’s been grossly misinterpreted, is it works (to public knowledge) based on proximity and not on-demand tracking. Like GPS receiver, always geolocating. That’s the whole point and context of the original post I made, which apparently I wasn’t clear on it.

Anonymous ID: 125b91 June 29, 2020, 2:45 a.m. No.9785194   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5235

>>9785135

 

Ok, makes sense.

 

I agree there is the possibility and it is totally feasible for a cell device to potentially have the necessary hardware to trigger/“illuminate” an RFID.

 

My question would then be if I am a new company and I want to embed a RFID tag into my products, how do I make a deal with Apple to have their iPhones send my company back the data? Who do you contact and how do you approach them to say you want this data available to you?

 

Lets say I make artwork and I want to track my paintings, how do I make a deal with Apple to let me receive such data?