>>9786303 (pb)

TBH, it sometimes is, kek.

Your point on free speech is spot on. Too many people think free speech = what I am happy with + just a little bit more (or not even).

>>9786469

lawfag here

doubtful it is or would be legally binding/recognized

for example, what office are you entering? duties? pretty vague.

that said, oaths have power, imho

"legally" binding may not be the only question