Anonymous ID: 567aa2 June 29, 2020, 11:49 a.m. No.9789114   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9144 >>9296 >>9357 >>9537 >>9667

Supreme Court decides Soros Funded Open Society's foreign affiliates do not have First Amendment rights or any constitutional rights

 

In 2003 the Congress passed "The leadership Act" to fight againts HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria globally. Congress has allocated billions of dollars to American and foreign nongovernmental organizations that combat HIV/AIDS/Tuberculosis and Malaria abroad. Congress only funds those who have or agree to have "a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking" This is known as the Policy Requirement.

 

It's worth to note American NGOs are not required to follow this Policy Requirement because they are protected by First Amendment.

 

This Soros funded NGO is located in the USA and they've been receiving funds from "The leadership Act" but they have refused to agree to policy of eradicating prostitution and sex trafficking and they can do so because First Amendment protects them as they are officially an american NGO. However what George Soros attempted to do here was extend First Amendment to apply all his other NGOs around the world which fight againts HIV/AIDS/Tuberculos and Malaria. He argued that they are part of his american NGO and therefore should have same kind of protection under constitution. So again why did he want to do this? Because his foreign NGOs refused to agree to "Policy Agreement" to eradicate prostitution and sex trafficking. Because they are foreign NGOs, they are forced to agree to "Police Agreement" or else they won't get any funding(or this is how it was supposed to be but because lower courts decided otherwise, they've been waiting for Supreme Court's decision) Can you believe Corrupt SDNY and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit actually agreed all Soros NGOs in foreign countries are protected by the constitution of the United States?

 

So the Supreme Court decided today his foreign NGOs are not protected by the constitution of the United States because foreign people or foreign NGOs located outside the USA can't possibly enjoy the rights of the american people. One of his NGOs being located inside the USA did not justify giving the same rights to his foreign NGOs. So now Soros either has to sign "Policy Agreement" with his foreign NGOs or lose all funding for those foreign NGOs.

 

Picture is from Supreme Court decision. You can read full 36 pages from the PDF below.

 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-177_b97c.pdf

Anonymous ID: 567aa2 June 29, 2020, 11:58 a.m. No.9789215   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9789144

 

It would appear this is one of the many ways to disrupt the flow of money to him through his NGOs. If Supreme Court gave his foreign NGOs constitutional rights, that would've been extremely bad in many ways so as you can see this decision was overall much more than just him not sucking money from taxpayers.