Well it has been Fun just not sure it has been real
KEK
aren't executive orders limited to governors and the president?
Wikipedia limits Executive Orders to the President of the United States, but this is not True Governors have been issuing them right and left for a few months.
Loyalists_critical.
A counter-attack to the 1st [law and order] strike _prepared and ready in an effort to change the narrative _prevent [blind] mass public awareness re: coord effort to remove [sitting] US POTUS _covertly disrupt CoC _regional comm as needed.
Media plans to disregard [re_label as political attack _AG election interference] and inject script.
Some commanding officers [EOs] may provide [CLAS 1-99] that do not reflect those [1-99] of the POTUS or the AG of United States.
Appropriate action should be taken.
Remember your oath.
Remember your mission.
Infiltration not invasion.
Defend and protect at all costs.
Q
This is very very odd commanding officers cannot evoke executive orders - That is based on the Executive Branch - and the only Commanding Officer in the Executive Branch is the President of the United States - Governors are not commanding officers.
An executive officer (CCE) is generally a person responsible for running an organization, although the exact nature of the role varies depending on the organization. In many militaries, an executive officer, or "XO", is the second-in-command, reporting to the commanding officer. The XO is typically responsible for the management of day-to-day activities, freeing the commander to concentrate on strategy and planning the unit's next move.
But if Q meant the XO should have used the abbreviation XO
it says commanding officers (EO) Enforcement officers are not commanding officers.
But a civi cannot declassify anything it is just a leak.
Commanding office XO usually second in command - EO (civi term - or executive order traditionally here).
This post is very odd.
Q Loyalists_critical.
A counter-attack to the 1st [law and order] strike _prepared and ready in an effort to change the narrative _prevent [blind] mass public awareness re: coord effort to remove [sitting] US POTUS _covertly disrupt CoC _regional comm as needed.
Media plans to disregard [re_label as political attack _AG election interference] and inject script.
Some commanding officers [EOs] may provide [CLAS 1-99] that do not reflect those [1-99] of the POTUS or the AG of United States.
Appropriate action should be taken.
Remember your oath.
Remember your mission.
Infiltration not invasion.
Defend and protect at all costs.
Q
So basically ignoring EO - The plan to enforce law and order thwarted - probably due to leak of intel - and if action taken they will attack AG Barr as trying to cause election interference.
So the question is what plan was thwarted?
I now get the last Q post Barr is about to go after big Media and big tech and the left will turn it around that he is causing election interference by taking legal action against the MSM and the Big Tech Censoring Giants.
The rest of the Q post is about telling Anons not to take violent action but show the truth by infiltrating the net and informing the public of the narrative shift mirror the left is doing.
the molly Train probably happened earlier.
it it is first amendment - Barr is mentioned he is going after censorship and they have the intel and are going to say he is guilty of election interference.