Loyalists_critical.

A counter-attack to the 1st [law and order] strike _prepared and ready in an effort to change the narrative _prevent [blind] mass public awareness re: coord effort to remove [sitting] US POTUS _covertly disrupt CoC _regional comm as needed.

Media plans to disregard [re_label as political attack _AG election interference] and inject script.

Some commanding officers [EOs] may provide [CLAS 1-99] that do not reflect those [1-99] of the POTUS or the AG of United States.

Appropriate action should be taken.

Remember your oath.

Remember your mission.

Infiltration not invasion.

Defend and protect at all costs.

Q

This post is about AG Barr prosecuting Big Tech Censorship based on the first amendment and the narrative twist the left will apply.

I do not get the EO thing.

>>9793714

>>9793737

This links to the censorship first amendment post by Q about AG Barr

Question could the commanding officers in last Q post mean most Execs in big Tech are intel operatives in command and their civi covers are EO's?

>>9793788

hmmm but then they just broke the law and did not commit treason by disobeying orders.

To be perfectly honest I think all of you thinking COVID KungFlu is nothing - go ahead - I find it asinine to ignore a level 4 bio-weapon with affects on T Lymphocytes and antibody response that returns over and over.

>>9793892

Covid remains alive on metal longer than paper.

>>9793954

The biggest thing in USA is first Amendment the first strike will be on the removal of the freedom of speech. BARR

>>9794083

IMO that is that the executive officers (EO) of those companies that are censoring are intelligence assets - (commanding officers) of their divisions.

>>9794083

it isn't like we don't already know that dod created facebook and gave it to Zuckerberg

>>9794144

Too obvious and that is blatant treason court-martial and possible execution.

>>9794144

And your scenario would have absolutely nothing to do with AG Barr.

>>9794191

No the entire executive branch executes an EO from the president.

And if the EO involves the military and pentagon Barr would have nothing to do with it.

>>9794209

I do not think EO means executive order I think it means Executive Officer - A civillian running a private company add the 1st thing and Barr and the election interference I get Barr will prosecute the censorship and bethe narrative shift will be election interference.

The sidebar is that all big tech EO's are controlled intel assets or commanding officers of their divisions. The declass part will probably be someone in the House like Nadler or Schiff.

>>9794217

no just difference of opinion as commanding officers cannot give executive orders. only President as commanding officer. Governors can but they are not commanding officers.

>>9794285

I already looked into that as second in command. But did not completely fit once I included the Barr thing then I notices 1ST. and BINGO 1st amendment and election interference and censorship it fit.

>>9794285

If it was all about the military Barr would not be in the post at all Unless I am wrong about what AG means.

>>9794353

How the hell would an Adjutant General have anything to do with declassification?

>>9794355

could be - but I think this virus just hides in the immune system to return later and attack other systems - level 4 bio-weapon and just does not act like any corona or flu out there closest is a cat disease FIP.

>>9794389

1-99 go back