Anonymous ID: 26534b June 30, 2020, 5:18 a.m. No.9798421   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9798390

>i banned his ID, pure shill!

Ok, thanks for the info Rabbi.

>>9798392

>In the police report, the couple was called the "victims." LEO knew what happened and saw it clearly for what it was.

Yeah but that Kimberly Gardner is saying "peaceful protesters were met by guns", her dox should be let out. Dox her whole family.

Anonymous ID: 26534b June 30, 2020, 6:13 a.m. No.9798801   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8822 >>8826

>>9798777

>Q appears to say there will be a military coup against the president and he is counting on loyalists to stop it? Am I reading that correctly?

Close, the "loyalists" are the ones that will be conducting it. The Loyalists were the troops loyal to Britain.

Anonymous ID: 26534b June 30, 2020, 6:21 a.m. No.9798852   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8894

>>9798824

>Black unemployment

RECORD BLACK UNEMPLOYMENT! yawnโ€ฆ

>>9798835

>So allow the enemy to have that 6% when elections are decided by 20 to 50 k votes?

>You aren't very good at this math thing. It shows.

You're not good at math and you don't know what the electoral college is. Go suck more nigger dick. If enough white people feel rejected from Trump never acknowledging them there's way more votes to lose this time around. You suck at math. Whites won him the election.

>>9798826

>The use of the term 'loyalists' has been setting off alarm bells with me since Q first started using it. Loyalists in the Revolution were loyal to the crown, wtf are they in this scenario?

I don't know, I think he's talking about the loyalists to the DS but it's not clear.