dChan
Anonymous ID: 9202ad June 30, 2020, 9:06 a.m. No.9800187   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0201

>>9800086

Relevant info:

 

Look.

Game_Theory has a central theme of complications that arise between two entities who can reason through each others success rates and expected moves.

 

"This dilemma, you realize with dread, is general: you must do what your pursuer least expects; but whatever you most expect her to least expect is automatically what she will most expect. You appear to be trapped in indecision. All that might console you a bit here is that, on the other side of the river, your pursuer is trapped in exactly the same quandary, unable to decide which bridge to wait at because as soon as she imagines committing to one, she will notice that if she can find a best reason to pick a bridge, you can anticipate that same reason and then avoid her."

 

In the context of Chinas War against us, we know they have blackmailed and have had control over a vast portion of critical American points of interest. With this, they knew what strings to pull to achieve victory [of subversion] and had the capacity to execute that leverage.

This made decision making easier for them.

 

Consider now, what leverages they have lost:

 

Think CEO departures.

Think FBI departures.

Think DOJ departures.

Think State departures.

Think WH departures.

Think DIA departures.

Think Pentagon departures.

Think Senate departures.

Think House departures.

Think Amb departures.

Think IG departures.

Think Judge install.

Think SC install.

Think WH install.

Think FBI install.

Think C_A install.

Think DOJ install.

Think US ATT install.

…………….

Game_theory.

If you look you can see.

Q

 

For each departure China lost leverage and America gained it back. A Zero Sum game.

Now what must China take into consideration before they make any moves? Uncertainty exponentially raises~

To the point of certain failure, should they attempt anything.

In fact what companies we couldn't trust before, may now be trusted if we know China lost its hold on them.

Checkmate.

We are winning far more than we know.

May God Bless Americas Military Intellegence.

 

For a journey of understanding Game _Theory: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/game-theory/

Anonymous ID: 9202ad June 30, 2020, 9:29 a.m. No.9800474   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I've updated the central Qproof of Trumps AF1 flight, in 2017. To me, this constitutes undeniable evidence that Q is of the highest Security Clearance within Americas Intelligence Services.

This War is very real. You're already involved.

 

This proof strikes down a few main claims against the validity of Q, namely, that they do not originate from within Americas Intelligence Services as well as their continuity of Identity.

 

"Q was taken over / hijacked" simply isn't so.

 

I have a question for each of you: What does a Presence of Force look like within the Combat Domain of People/Culture?

In the Combat Domain of Space, we have Satellites.

In the Combat Domain of Cyber, we have Networks.

In the Combat Domain of Air, we have Planes.

In the Combat Domain of Ground, we have Tanks.

In the Combat Domain of Sea, we have Ships.

In the Combat Domain of People… what do we have?

 

Another Question: Are we at War?

Is there a War against a deeply entrenched network of people, bound by blackmail and malicious thirst for power/control?

Would this network have a hierarchy similar to a Shadow Government?

What assets do they own, that afflict the Combat Domain of People?

Are the hydra-like 'Main(lame)' stream medias singing the same tune?

Does that provide a combative advantage to their control over people?

Is control over that powerful of a spell, likely to disband without a fight?

Who would they be fighting against?

Are there those that swore an oath to defend The People, The Constitution, from enemies foreign and domestic?

 

What would their Presence of Force, in the Combat Domain of People, look like?

Anonymous ID: 9202ad June 30, 2020, 9:29 a.m. No.9800479   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0513

As far as we're aware, discussions (atm) that that focus on anything but exposing our enemies next application of their bioweapon is fruitless~

 

What.

Is.

The.

Next.

Soft.

Target.

That.

The.

DS.

Will.

Use.

To.

Inflate.

The.

New.

Virus.

Death.

Rates?

 

At first they shoved infected people into nursing homes.

>Next challenge: rise in cases [due to testing inc & MX>CA] but overall decrease in death rates [nursing home scandal in public domain _no longer viable option].

 

So is it just a raise in cases?

Are they going to send them to another vulnerable group?

HOW ARE THEY GOING TO KILL MORE PEOPLE WITH THEIR AGING BIOWEAPON?!

CREATE A NEW ONE?!

TARGET A SOFT GROUP?!

 

If we find out what their next target / plan is, and expose it, WE SAVE LIVES.

Remember, we are at War, Soldiers.

Now is the moment of Action.