>>9799178 (pb)

It is written especially dense. Probably on purpose.

The most interesting part to me was this: Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell epitopes revealed preexisting T-cell responses in 81% of unexposed individuals, and validation of similarity to common cold human coronaviruses provided a functional basis for postulated heterologous immunity[9] in SARS-CoV-2 infection[10,11].

In English: 81% of people not exposed to WuFlu had an immune response ("T-cell response") to it.

(Aside for some: vaccine or prior infection provides info to your immune system to be able to fight off same disease/virus in the future).

So, this article basically asserts they found:

1. You do not need a specific antibody to fight off WuFlu.

2. 81% of people (well, their sample cannot probably be generalized to full population, but approx.) are already functionally immune to WuFlu.

>https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-35331/v1

>>9801425

Both corn and bamboo are crazy. Sometimes you can just about hear them growing.

>>9801428

Actually, waiting on your neighbors….

>>9801451

Easy as 1-2-3

1. Intimidation

2. Fear

3. Must use mail-in voting

Doesn't matter who the sheep vote for then, they won't be the ones deciding who wins.

>>9801449

I'm sorry, anon!

If it would help your feelings, read on masks - they do nothing (actually make things worse in many cases) for many reasons, including not being used/disposed properly. If she wore mask everywhere, she could have picked up virus anywhere, and then when she took mask off and rubbed her eye ……

>>9801494

This is nice.

I imagine the color flag background was too jarring?