>>980412
Physicianfag here. I followed Indicter (the group that released the video of the white helmets killing babies for propaganda) and I fully agree with what they say. Now that I know this, I look at all the Syrian pictures (post-gassing) and it is clear that they are fake. How do I know:
-Always young children pictured to tug on the heart strings
-Oxygen masks are random
-Bed occupancy is random (always a ramshackle ER but the next video will be of a polished doctor with empty beds behind)
-ALWAYS ALWAYS young male doctors. You know, the age that the white helmets (jihadis) are.
-Always narrow angle views of anything (to avoid the full picture, think CNN)
-No 'patients' are on ventilators
-Dead 'patients' are always randomly placed in the fake ER (e.g. at right angles). This wouldn't happen, it's not considerate of the dead
-'Patients' are lined up in parallel but only some of them are receiving any treatment (oxygen, IV). If you don't need treatment in a hospital with no resources you are told to GTFO
-Random distribution of blood. If it's gas, there aren't shrapnel injuries. Make up your minds guys.
-OK the clincher for me is this (and this may change after this post), THERE ARE NEVER EVER ANY WOMEN SHOWN DEAD OR WITH CLOTHES MISSING.
Well isn't that convenient? If your culture says that you must never ever show flesh on a woman and you are going to stage a scene, there is no way that you could go against your culture. Nature and science doesn't do this. A gas attack that kills children will kill women (the men don't associate with the children they drink coffee and smoke - and of course plot the next terror attack - well away from the children that are always with the women).
It's all staged folks. Listen to Vanessa Beeley. If you haven't seen "let's talk about the boy in the ambulance" stop what you're doing and get on YT.
https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwYVBKYTYnk