lb Q >>9811291
>How do you demonstrate 'reasonable cause' to regulate and/or break up BIG TECH?
(based on EO 4.4.20 DNI can investigate ownership and management, and potentially find Nat. Security or legal violations, e.g. election interference, discrimination, suppresion of US citizens 1A, and require mitigation, coupled w/SC decision that says 1A does not automatically apply to non-US citizens/entities, it i ironic that foreign influence with limited 1A protection are removing US people 1A)
1- SC opinion/ruling re. OSF foreign entities not granted 1A Constitutional Protections. This likely can be applied as precedent re. Foreign Ownership/Influence in Telecommunications pursuant to EO 4.4.20
2- EO of 4.4.20 grants DNI ability to investigate/trace ownernship and likely to make decisions/assumptions as to motive of decision making processes, e.g, political, economic.
3- With SC ruling re. OSF applied with EO, other court decisions, if a foreign owner is using licensed or regulated Telecommunications for political reasons or reasons to cause harm to Potus or our Government or processes, they are not automatically guaranteed 1A protections so motive can this be explored and handled in a case by case basis.
4- EO can thus ask for mitigation to concerns that arise under the threat of license revokation.
5- Upon reading EO it seems Nat Security is a determining factor, allowing DNI a key position in fact finding.