>>9816280 (lb)

>I remember when the q clock began in late 2017 or early 2018, but I don’t remember how it started up. It wasn’t like Q said, “clock my posts” one day.

12-07 was kinda the date, or date it pointed back to? (going off memory) ... "clock my posts" (think I get this now)

>That said, It’s fascinating to see the precision.

fasten 8in g metronoming the ward. From the infinite now to the ti me realm seems to require an off-screen ticker for some sit u at ions.

>>9816351

[37] on the clock today.

Reminds me of a minor offshoot "look into" (not so much dig) I did on Pittsburghs docked old submarine, the reQuin.

>>9816491

I think I catch your drift.

I thought so. That area is DESIGNED and BUILT all around symbolism.

>>9816643

>>9816721

>3's

would agree, but [37] is today, so [37] on clock or 7-3 on date? Fun times.