>>9818906 (pb)

lawfag here

you are going to have to get around/over the cases upholding masks/quarantine/etc. for the 1918 pandemic PLUS local health authority statutes and regulations

i agree with your anger and your cause is just

don't think its a winning legal one though (yet, and maybe never)

to me, best approach would be to argue that threat is minimal, and response excessive

Likely though that there is not enough evidence for this yet, too much hearsay, etc - remember, you won't be arguing in front of anons