Regarding abortion Q asked if it is about a woman's right to choose or something else. Baby tissues are highly profitable and some can be obtained from a child that survives. Others (such as baby hearts) must apparently be harvested from a child that is still alive. Some time ago I read this piece about the profit made from baby foreskin tissue harvested during circumcision procedures. I wonder how many parents would have their babies circumcised if they knew (according to this article) that the hospital performing the surgery could gain up to $100,000 for the child's foreskin. We like to think medical science is humane, modern and sanitary. It is the opposite when it involves experimentation on babies and other living things that cannot consent

https://healthimpactnews.com/2017/baby-foreskin-is-being-used-to-make-vaccines/

The screen cap is a brief quote from the piece.

>>9819615

The BS "wu flu" or whatever, will disappear lickety-splickety when the class action lawsuits start flying. How is it that masks are used in hospitals to make the patient "feel better" but are substandard, ineffective and dangerous to the wearer if not used properly? Can anyone say "OSHA"? How many people will grow ill from poisons in hand-sanitizers? How many people will suffer psychological problems from being "locked down"? How many people's health will be tanked by lack of exposure to normal flora in the environment? What if the mold in a mask makes someone sick? Can an employer mandate masks without providing all the resources to make sure they work properly? How can unelected bureaucrats or elected "officials" without a hint of medical expertise dictate "health rules" to the rest of us?

Some folks talk about using 'law fare' to Islamicize the United States. How about we do something different? Mass sustained, continuous lawsuits until we create the largest transfer of wealth from unelected, unaccountable, DS actors and corporate shills to the deserving citizens that this country has ever seen. With so many unemployed we have lots of time on our hands to figure this out.

>>9819769

Lawfag, can you describe what can be done about "conflicts of interest"? I am sure they are important in the situation that you are researching regarding General Flynn, but such conflicts are absolutely rampant among our agencies. For example, the CDC committee that decides on "recommended" childhood vaccines is populated with pharmaceutical insiders even though it should not be. Can this be addressed legally? Who do we complain to when we notice blatant "conflicts of interest"?

>>9819830

Common sense anon. ALL gatherings for 4th of July are approved with or without masks. Just inform Governor Nuisance that you are protesting discrimination against "people of color" (Red, White and Blue Patriots).

>>9819679

I believe that this is the very reason Democrats will not protect infants born alive after abortion procedures and (possibly) why toxic vaccines are intentionally given to babies. Both these methods would produce babies that could be harvested for adrenochrome, and/or profitable tissues.

>>9819874

Thanks for the response. I believe evidence for "threat is minimal" could be obtained. The HighWire recently showed how the risk of death from "COVID-19" is lower than that from certain flu shots, for example.

>>9820024

I agree. I am ready to call BS for anyone getting upset about that comment. We have free speech in America. No one was threatened, a crowded movie theater wasn't emptied with tragic results so its really okay. I'm not going to let the "left" intimidate me over stupid speech rules that only apply one way. If someone shouted "black power" would they have gotten in ANY trouble?