*One nano-meter is about as long as your fingernail grows in one second!
*A human hair is approximately 80,000- 100,000 nano-meters wide!
Infected yet asymptomatic people are of particular concern because the particles they breathe are predominantly bio-aerosols
Given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm (nano-meters)), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.
Oh, right…that bandana, cloth mask, surgical mask is going to be a big help to you!
And you are forcing nano-meters of viable virus aerosol particles through, just by breathing, breathing heavy, laughing, coughing, sneezing, or breathing in….besides being contaminated by just wearing once. And people are wearing the same contaminated mask that they keep in their cars.
CDC indicates COVID infection-fatality rate less than 1%
https://www.wnd.com/…/cdc-indicates-covid-infection…/
Now they are lumping in false positive covid 19 tests due to the common cold!!!
If more testing is being done, that alone could be the reason for more positive Covid 19 results due to a COMMON COLD, in addition to the protests/riots?
Per CDC…If you test positive
A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing/serology-overview.html?fbclid=IwAR0WZ62qLxRSz4Y2cOKbJUdPlPEcjak7WBG3pSkg0Z6Goepd2k6q5ntm9tE
There is no actual scientific evidence or proof that COVID-19 will occur in waves!!!! More Fear Mongering Tactics from the left!!!!
There is no actual scientific evidence or proof that masks protect you from Covid 19 from a Communist China level 4 bio-safety lab! None!
Evidence from 14 trials on the use of masks vs. no masks was disappointing: it showed no effect in either healthcare workers or in community settings. We could also find no evidence of a difference between the N95 and other types of masks but the trials comparing the two had not been carried in aerosol-generating procedures. Cloth masks, where there is no evidence of effectiveness. Another paper: The other looked particularly at SARS-CoV-2 and found no effect of either surgical or fabric masks on reducing virus spread.
Data do not back cloth masks to limit COVID-19, experts say.
National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
In the paper, the National Academies' Standing Committee on Emerging Infectious Diseases and 21st Century Health Threats said that, because no studies have been done on the effectiveness of cloth masks in preventing transmission of coronavirus to others, it is impossible to assess their benefits, if any.
Committee members point out that research suggests that COVID-19 can spread via invisible droplets as small as 5 microns and by tiny bioaerosol particles as well as via visible respiratory droplets just by breathing.
Infected yet asymptomatic people are of particular concern because the particles they breathe are predominantly bioaerosols.
Michael Osterholm, PhD, MPH, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP), who contributed to the paper along with Sundaresan Jayaraman, PhD, of the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, said in his weekly CIDRAP podcast yesterday that, because aerosols likely play an important role in coronavirus transmission, cloth masks will do little, if anything, to limit spread of the disease.
Masks and respirators do not work.
There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.
https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy