posting anything en masse is shill posting.
occasional baker here, I agree the kitchen has problems, but help us fix them organically rather than via copypasta.
>The first step to fixing the problem is alerting Anon to the nature of the problem.
I agree with this, and thank you for trying.
>1 post a thread is not spam.
it will probably be seen that way by anons, whether that is your intention or not.
AFLB, muhjoo shills, and others all post this way. anons react to all of it the same way: generate organic content or gtfo.
Repetitive content as it is already used today is designed to condition bakers and anons to ignore certain topics. You will be perceived to have the same goal if you use the same tactics.
>They have established our implicit consent through the incremantalized compromising of various aspects of our community since its inception and now have effectively put themselves in a position of monopolizing the interpretation of Anons research and how it is accessed(wearethene.ws, twitter, etc).
I don't agree with this part either, here you are adding a new issue without substantiation for that issue. If there is a problem with how anons are using outside resources then you need to bring it to the board's attention and be clear and specific, as you've done with the Ghislaine thing.
>One objective at a time, alert Anons to the nature of the problem, find likeminded people, share notes, proceed from there.
We'll be here. It may be unpleasant, but there are enough of us who still give a shit (morality and oaths and such) that we will probably be ok.
>namefag bakers are namefag cancer
do you have another suggestion for how to keep shills out of the kitchen or are you just bitching?