>>9858724 (lb)
Don't make memes like this about yourself, bro...
Absolutely Mr. Pig.
Not enough of a "personality" to warrant anyone making that meme, however, the posterprobably (You)of the Pig cat got a big ego boost when the Toots/Pig memes came out the other night.
It was a one night thing, though; don't let that become to surge in ego.
Although, any namefag always becomes "something" on here. The people/normie-types do so love their recognizable identities.
Toots/Daniel/McThistle/Pig now. All forced. All whatever. Always someone getting that little "celebrity" ego fill, whether they can admit it or not.
People do themselves–or, rather, (you) do (you).
Ah, yes, as the multitude of IP's on Toots, on AFLB, on etc. etc.
But, no, there's never been an attempt to cover for something when it's called out…
You're the retarded kind of special, aren't you?
No, faglet: it's the namefagging, as clearly stated, though thank you for attempting to comprehend the structure of an arguement.
And believe me, fuck these "image board persona's" people serve themselves up without qualm; you'll see why the "Toots" picture's been used here since the beginning–OG famefag, and I don't even want it…
Ironically, to the perceptive eye, even one's grammatical structure can be "recognized" and "personified", and such things imitated, for either end…
There is no "Mr. Pig" hate: it's literally just me calling out the name/famefagging now–tonight.
The fact you pretend there is this "movement" behind the persona that either defends or attacks it is…pitiful, and I'll leave it at that.
Yes, Pig, Toots, McThistle, Freddy Benson, or "Glork" fucker. There was no autist struggling to commune in the only way they knew: it was a faggot namefagging, because they wanted their persona known.
And believe me, anon, I don't call it out for jealousy: my life is unintentional famefag. And I fucking hate it…
Calm down on those 11 posts, yo–heavy flow?
Had no intention to stop you, anon: literally don't give a shit about your opinion.
And that's not a sign of disrespect, just my honest intention in calling the shit out.
>new consensus
Nigga, you're "supposed" to think for yourself.
Hence why I don't follow name/famefags, but, you do you…or some namefag, as you're so keen to clasp at.
This particular "chatty Kathy" was the only one on the battlefield in 2017 when they tried to take over the notables…
But, that's okay, your single comment"chat", I'm sorryhas contributed vastly.
When we next need someone to make the tea while the rest of us call out the shills, the clowns, the bullshit, I'll be thinking of you, ya big lug.
And P.S., if "-isms" are so bad as you sayy'know, labelswhy label oneself with a name when that defines you as "something other" than anon here…
Y'know, something divisive?
Again, this is all you have?
One can read and see the difference between irritation at blatant needless namefaggingy'know, anons are nameless, faceless, etc.or one can take issue with the one calling that shit out.
As your side has now.
Again, triggered is an inability to defend a position causing one to act in a way in which one's actions are indefencible…
Such as defending namefagging and the like.
Again, anon, we both know I can win this–we both know I have won this: only namefag we need here is Q, and that's for a very good reason.
Other persona's that lead to more 'Fagbook' interacting on this platform is the last thing we need…
But, again, (((You))) do (((You))),
Kek. I do have the habbit.
Been a fun bread, anons.
Much love to you all from across the pond.
(I'd have been on your side back then)
Alright…