>>9859444

Either you missed the point, or, divisionshillery is getting sophisticated.

>>9827385 pb/Q:

"Maxwell family background?

Robert Maxwell history [intel, agency, wealth, [CLAS 1-99]]?

Sometimes it's the people in the background that are of greater significance."

We already knew about MOS connections [unless, of course, you are a newfag] and discussed them ad nauseum. Q essentially tells us to dig deeper.

So we dug. And you blew a gasket because baker did not notable old news [Maxwell/MOS]. The fact that a bunch of Anons correctly recalled the Ep/Max/MOS connections is glorious hive mind, but it's not notable.

Maybe you just need to put down the keyboard and BROWS MOAR. The purpose of notables is not self-congratulations for recalling what we already know; especially when Q wants us to dig deeper.

FFS

>>9859604

The Maxwells seem to be at the epicenter of all fuckery. Was that the same sister who married a Djerrasi - and HRC gave their son a top spot at State? If not, how many of Robert's 9 kids are involved in DS fuckery? Nothing surprises me with that family, now.

>>9859912

>Wouldn't be a reason to DEFUND THE POLICE now would it?

Interdasting theory.