>>9903693

>The ones that control our skies are good…

What makes you think that? Can you give 100% proof of that? What makes you think the evil ones don't reply every so often in order to pacify the seekers? What is for sure whether they are good or bad they definitely don't want to show up close, they always stay way back and just show you a flashing light here or a distant object that you can never really make out what it is. Good or bad, they don't like being recorded or seen up close. Now why is that? Why are they always so distant as to keep you guessing? What I find funny is how many authorities seem to show up on this thread and they all seem to absolutely know all the answers but yet never any actual factual evidence or proof is given. Just statements no sauce. So are you part of the secret space force? Are you a top ranking commander who has all the highest level intel to back this up? Or are you telling us something you read on the internet? Just because the evil ones aren't openly showing themselves harvesting humanity it doesn't mean they aren't trying to hide and blend in. There is no proof to suggest that "friendly ones rule the slies". What there is proof of is evil ones working with the highest level families that control our planet. So why not flash a light here and there to pacify the population to make us THINK that friendlies rule the skies? Apparently you don't "think mirror" very much.

>>9904492

>CE5

>CE5

>CE5

>CE5

>CE5

Why do you try so hard, and I mean desperately hard, to put a label and a trademark on something that people have done for thousands of years? People weren't able to see things prior to calling it CE5. Hasn't happened for thousands of years. Why is it so important for you to constantly label sightings as CE5? Why do you need griers slogan on something that shouldn't belong to a single group or narrative?

>>9909888

>fearmongering

I remember shills using that meme a few breads ago when certain topics were being discussed.

>>9912460

>fear mongering

It is an interesting overuse of the word already. Also interesting how the cliche comes from the "trusted ce5 guy" and team. Also interesting that as soon as anons bring up evil aliens it's always met with this "fear monger" title. Labels, didnt one of the anons go over labels the shills like to use? Fear monger is at the top of the pile right now for anyone who questions their narrative, just funny how it always seems to come from the same voices who always seem to be on here.

>>9912460

>Some of the shit people post about ET is so far off the wall it's unbelievable. But that's ok. They are only behaving like they have been taught, and critical thinking is becoming scarce.

Well isn't it just awesome that the world's most elite CE5 team and its leader are always on here to set us straight. Oh these stupid anons what do they know? Only what they've been taught. Cant blame the anons they dont have access to any of that top secret material, but CE5 anon does! At least someone is here who knows all the answers, we dont need Q when we have a CE5 anon. Go on tell us again that theres no evil aliens and we're all fear mongers for discussing it.

Try using different wording when IP hopping to control your narrative. You know what you've been doing for years on here?