>drops hints about Epstein’s ties to the CIA.
But probably skirts the ties to MOS.
I find CDAN interesting, but it’s tough to take seriously without diggs or evidence supporting the claims made.
I like it as much as the next guy, but proof it ain’t. It’s more useful anons find supporting evidence after cdan puts a clue out there.
But hey, I’m not the baker. It’s your call.
Point taken.
>SERIOUS QUESTION -> Are Wuhan's problems big enough that China would seek to destroy all evidence with a massive flood event?
Yes. Worst case scenario is war, best case is massive lawsuits.
Link or can you explain what happened? I see her pic often and I know it ain’t a happy ending.
Thanks anon