>>9872643 pb

There are now 2000+ Articles on Q & 8chan/qun

Oct 2017 - July 3 2020

This is a very conservative estimate of total number of MSM q- and 8chan/kun articles, because it doesn't include articles in other languages (many), those that just mention Q in passing, or twitter posts. Almost all the articles I found were on Q, not 8kun.

APRIL & MAY 2020

After something of a lull in April (due to the MSM's total obsession with "muh covid oh my gawd!!!"), MSM resumed its attacks against Q in May, focusing especially on how "far-right" groups give out "misinformation" on covid-related stuff like vaxxes and treatments like HCQ. Also on George Floyd at the end of May.

There was a noticeable increased in the diversity of the attacks in May - more than ever, it's becoming a matter of slinging mud at the wall and hoping that something sticks. But as in the past, there's not much response. Because more and more, it's the MSM who looks paranoid, extreme (because they push the narrative so hard that we and other conservatives as all gun-toting, potentially violent, far-right white supremicists). People just don't buy what they're selling anymore.

JUNE & JULY 2020

Election season!

Big focus on primaries and trying to villify any candidate who shows the least interest in Q. When some win their primaries, MSM is aghast (because in the past, any professional they managed to associate with Q either had to resign or was fired from their position). Suddenly, they are faced with the prospect of popular Q supporting candidates like Lauren Boebert being elected to office. (Panic, panic!!)

more details to come…..

>>9873510

Clarification: all the recent articles (since April 2020) are on Q not 8kun.

>>9872629 pb

Nice summary!

a lot of this info is also in qresear.ch from last year, kek.

>>9873490

American Thinker) has several fair articles on Q. They are just about the ONLY fair and positive ones. Glad to see another.

One of the articles below was reprinted by ZeroHedge, as well (the first Jan 2020 one). Amer. Thinker got slammed by hackers for that, last article documents this.

Skurkiss, Peter https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/12/who_is_qanon.html

Q AMERTH 2018-12-10

Franklin, Deborah https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/01/an_introduction_to_q.html [positive!!]

Q AMERTHINK 2020-01-14

Widburg, Andrea https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/hackers_targeted_american_thinker_after_it_put_up_a_post_about_q.html

Q AMERTHNK 2020-01-20

>>9873568

>https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/as_the_crisis_deepens_q_says_rise_or_die.html?utm_source=whatfinger

Agree that it's important to be careful about descriptions that may make mainstream audiences believe we are acting outside the arena of purely digital warfare. I do think this article is carefully worded.

However, in your post, you talk about about legally activating militias - which seems to me to go beyond the scope of our work here, since we deal solely in the realm of ideas, right?

>>9873677

>All praise Q!

you looking for some kind of new religion?

wrong place

>>9873300

You are rockin' it baker.

o7

>>9873765

hmmm….mostly agree with q but not bc i follow blindly.

But i do not agree with everything others say on this board but i tend to work with others by looking for areas of commonality. Yes, i could easily alienate people but why do that?

and calling me a retard show your limitations, not mine.