>>9877874 (lb)
Bro-it was deleted. I posted it, then (you)'d my way up to see responses, and it was gone. OK? I'm not stupid I know how this place works. I reposted it with a loud complaint. Hoping that just ONE person would respond and actually thing about it. SO make of that what you will. They also made a huge "funny' deal of making sure the Assange video stayed buried last week.
They deleted an entire thread that was not breaking a single rule and IT aka FUNGUS made sure to post in the thread, laughing bout the "power" to delete it and they DID. Now, whether or not there is a way (there is) to hide shit they delete...come the fuck on.
I'm not bitchmoaning because blah blah my posts, I am genuinely horrified and fucking--I did not want this to be true. BUT IT IS. We are now on thread 2 where I have posted the Assange video and the 2 questions, and, as expected (just like last time) the only engagement has been strawman attacks. I do not get this, both the video and the questions are logical responses to actual events that we used to care about here.
Come on, Assange is the one person that let us see the pedo shit, that clued us into the murder of Seth Rich. HE EXPOSED pedogate and now no one wants to know his name? How is this possible? It was his work and risk taking that helped get Trump elected.
CIA is clearly running Wikileaks now...yeah they have it all-will we ever see it? WHY is the CIA that is clearly running Wikileaks doing hunting a child? Who ordered this? WHY does Q say "we have it all" when the CIA does indeed have it all..I want to know, I want to discuss this.
Last week when I posted the video for the first time I predicted that Q would come in on a posting frenzy. That happened. Then I waited a few days and reposted it same question and same prediction, and guess who came in again, on another posting frenzy.
When someone doesn't want me to discuss something, when a posting frenzy makes the breads move so fast no one sees it--that makes me want to know even more.
Embedded video is what we are discussing. (or rather, NOT discussing)
>>9877474 (lb)
Implying that a CIA run board can't hide that something was deleted. I'm not lying, I posted it, went to look for responses, it was gone. Note to the CIA, going to start taking screenshots of you fuckers.